Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Jun;118(6):925-43.
doi: 10.1007/s00702-010-0546-9. Epub 2011 Jan 9.

Difficulties with differentiating botulinum toxin treatment effects in essential blepharospasm

Affiliations
Review

Difficulties with differentiating botulinum toxin treatment effects in essential blepharospasm

Bettina Wabbels et al. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Blepharospasm is a focal dystonia in which the extraocular muscles contract repetitively, leading to excessive blinking and forced eyelid closure. Botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) is the primary symptomatic treatment for blepharospasm and its effects have been evaluated using numerous rating scales. The main scales in use today were initially used to determine whether BoNTA treatment was superior to placebo, and most controlled trials have confirmed this. More recently, these scales have been used to determine whether there are efficacy differences between different BoNTs in blepharospasm. However, although the scales used in these trials are able to differentiate the effects of BoNT from placebo, they may not be sensitive enough to differentiate between BoNTs. Most of the scales include only four possible points for each item, which would necessitate a 25% greater improvement in one group than the other to detect any differences. Current scales are also relatively insensitive to patients with mild disability who may experience mainly psychosocial problems related to their blepharospasm. Clinical trials comparing BoNTs that include substantial numbers of mildly affected patients may be unlikely to find differences because the scales do not adequately measure mild symptoms. Additional challenges with evaluating blepharospasm include the lack of precision and objectivity of current measures, symptom variability, the need to evaluate aspects of the disorder that are most important to patients, and the different types of blepharospasm. Although no single scale may be able to capture all relevant aspects of blepharospasm, more sensitive and patient-centered scales are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Jankovic Rating Scale (Jankovic and Orman 1987)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Blepharospasm Disability Index (Roggenkämper et al. 2006); scale originally described in Goertelmeyer et al.

References

    1. Aramideh M, Ongerboer de Visser BW, Devriese PP, Bour LJ, Speelman JD. Electromyographic features of levator palpebrae superioris and orbicularis oculi muscles in blepharospasm. Brain. 1994;117(Pt 1):27–38. doi: 10.1093/brain/117.1.27. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boyle MH, McGwin G, Jr, Flanagan CE, Vicinanzo MG, Long JA. High versus low concentration botulinum toxin A for benign essential blepharospasm: does dilution make a difference? Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;25:81–84. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e31819946c4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brashear A, Gordon MF, Elovic E, Kassicieh VD, Marciniak C, Do M, Lee CH, Jenkins S, Turkel C. Intramuscular injection of botulinum toxin for the treatment of wrist and finger spasticity after a stroke. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:395–400. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011892. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brin M, Blitzer A, Herman S, Steward C. Oromandibular dystonia: treatment of 96 cases with botulinum A. In: Jankovic J, Hallett M, editors. Therapy with botulinum toxin. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1994. pp. 429–435.
    1. Brin MF, Jankovic J, Comella C, Blitzer A, Tsui JKC, Pullman SL. Treatment of dystonia using botulinum toxin. In: Kurlan R, editor. Treatment of movement disorders. New York: Lippincott Company; 1995. pp. 183–246.

MeSH terms

Substances