Discrimination of contour-deleted images in baboons (Papio papio) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)

Abstract

Humans readily group component elements into a coherent perceptual whole and perceive the global form of visual patterns in priority over local features, which stands in contrast to at least some data from the animal literature, suggesting possible species differences in perceptual processes. In this study, chimpanzees and baboons were required to match intact and partially contour-deleted line-drawings in a computerized task in order to further explore the ability of nonhuman primates to group component elements into a coherent perceptual whole and to determine to what extent they use the global form or the local features. Experiment 1 showed that the baboons and chimpanzees matched intact continuous line-drawings (intact-intact) more easily than partially contour-deleted line-drawings (deleted-deleted). Both species could also match partially deleted line-drawings with their intact version (deleted-intact), but at a lower performance level. Experiment 2 further showed that subjects from the two species could match partially deleted coherent line-drawings (deleted-deleted) more easily than their scrambled incoherent versions (scrambled-scrambled). They could however match the coherent deleted forms with their scrambled version (deleted-scrambled). It is suggested that solutions of these tasks rely on the processing of both global and local cues, with no clear-cut species difference in that ability. Overall, the results show that contour completion of line-drawings was not easy. Implications on the processing of human-made two-dimensional representations such as line-drawings are discussed.