Air pollution, lung function, and physical symptoms in communities near concentrated Swine feeding operations
- PMID: 21228696
- PMCID: PMC5800517
- DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182093c8b
Air pollution, lung function, and physical symptoms in communities near concentrated Swine feeding operations
Abstract
Background: Concentrated animal feeding operations emit air pollutants that may affect health. We examined associations of reported hog odor and of monitored air pollutants with physical symptoms and lung function in people living within 1.5 miles of hog operations.
Methods: Between September 2003 and September 2005, we measured hydrogen sulfide (H2S), endotoxin, and particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5, and PM2.5-10) for approximately 2-week periods in each of 16 eastern North Carolina communities. During the same time periods, 101 adults sat outside their homes twice a day for 10 minutes, reported hog odor and physical symptoms, and measured their lung function. Conditional fixed-effects logistic and linear regression models were used to derive estimates of associations.
Results: The log odds (±1 standard error) of acute eye irritation following 10 minutes outdoors increased by 0.53 (±0.06) for every unit increase in odor, by 0.15 (±0.06) per 1 ppb of H2S, and by 0.36 (±0.11) per 10 μg/m of PM10. Odor and H2S were also associated with irritation and respiratory symptoms in the previous 12 hours. The log odds of difficulty breathing increased by 0.50 (±0.15) per unit of odor. A 10 μg/m increase in mean 12-hour PM2.5 was associated with increased log odds of wheezing (0.84 ± 0.29) and declines in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (-0.04 ± 0.02 L). A 10 EU/mg increase in endotoxin was associated with increased log odds of sore throat (0.10 ± 0.05), chest tightness (0.09 ± 0.04), and nausea (0.10 ± 0.05).
Conclusions: Pollutants measured near hog operations are related to acute physical symptoms in a longitudinal study using analyses that preclude confounding by time-invariant characteristics of individuals.
Comment in
-
Advancing industrial livestock production: health effects research and sustainability.Epidemiology. 2011 Mar;22(2):216-8. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318209d3a4. Epidemiology. 2011. PMID: 21293206 No abstract available.
References
-
- Air Emissions from Animal Feeding Operations: Current Knowledge, Future Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2003. National Research Council Ad Hoc Committee on Air Emissions from Animal Feeding Operations.
-
- Schiffman SS. Livestock odors: implications for human health and well-being. J Anim Sci. 1998;76:1343–1355. - PubMed
-
- Schiffman SS, Walker JM, Dalton P, et al. Potential health effects of odor from animal operations, wastewater treatment, and recycling of byproducts. J Agromedicine. 2004;9:397–403. - PubMed
-
- Hoff SJ, Bundy DS, Nelson MA, et al. Emissions of ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and odor before, during, and after slurry removal from a deep-pit swine finisher. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2006;56:581–590. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials