Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2011 Jul;137(7):1085-93.
doi: 10.1007/s00432-010-0972-y. Epub 2011 Jan 13.

18F-FDG PET or PET-CT to evaluate prognosis for head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

18F-FDG PET or PET-CT to evaluate prognosis for head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis

Peng Xie et al. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2011 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the prognostic value of standard uptake value (SUV) from serial Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) in patients with head and neck cancer.

Methods: We searched for articles limited to head and neck cancer, dealt with the impact of SUV on survival and published in English. The endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and local control (LC). Two reviewers extracted data independently.

Results: Thirty-five studies were identified; of which, 26 studies involving 1,415 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pooled survival data suggested better DFS, OS, and LC in patients with low SUV of pre-treatment, and the odds ratio (OR) was 0.23, 0.24, and 0.27, respectively. Patients having tumors with low SUV of post-treatment also had significantly better DFS (OR = 0.17) and OS (OR = 0.28) than those with high SUV.

Conclusions: The present meta-analysis showed that (18)F-FDG uptake, as measured by the SUV before treatment and metabolic response after treatment, are valuable for predicting long-term survival in head and neck cancer. High (18)F-FDG uptake may be useful for identifying patients requiring more aggressive treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There is no conflict of interest among authors.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The study selection procedure of meta-analysis
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Meta-analysis of 9 studies dealt with the predictive value of pre-treatment SUV for DFS
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Meta-analysis of 12 studies dealt with the predictive value of pre-treatment SUV for OS
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Meta-analysis of 8 studies dealt with the predictive value of pre-treatment SUV for LC
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Meta-analysis of 5 studies dealt with the predictive value of post-treatment SUV for DFS
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Meta-analysis of 5 studies dealt with the predictive value of post-treatment SUV for OS

References

    1. Allal AS, Dulguerov P, Allaoua M et al (2002) Standardized uptake value of 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose in predicting outcome in head and neck carcinomas treated by radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 20(5):1398–1404 - PubMed
    1. Allal AS, Slosman DO, Kebdani T et al (2004) Prediction of outcome in head-and-neck cancer patients using the standardized uptake value of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59(5):1295–1300 - PubMed
    1. Bernier J, Domenge C, Ozsahin M et al (2004) Postoperative irradiation with or without concomitant chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 350(19):1945–1952 - PubMed
    1. Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J et al (2006) Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 354(6):567–578 - PubMed
    1. Brun E, Kjellén E, Tennvall J et al (2002) FDG PET studies during treatment: prediction of therapy outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 24(2):127–135 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances