Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr;13(4):325-32.
doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182011636.

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an assessment of genetic counselors' knowledge and beliefs

Kathryn T Hock  1 , Kurt D Christensen, Beverly M Yashar, J Scott Roberts, Sarah E Gollust, Wendy R Uhlmann
Affiliations

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an assessment of genetic counselors' knowledge and beliefs

Kathryn T Hock et al. Genet Med. 2011 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: Direct-to-consumer genetic testing is a new means of obtaining genetic testing outside of a traditional clinical setting. This study assesses genetic counselors' experience, knowledge, and beliefs regarding direct-to-consumer genetic testing for tests that would currently be offered in genetics clinics.

Methods: Members of the National Society of Genetic Counselors completed a web-administered survey in February 2008.

Results: Response rate was 36%; the final data analysis included 312 respondents. Eighty-three percent of respondents had two or fewer inquiries about direct-to-consumer genetic testing, and 14% had received requests for test interpretation or discussion. Respondents believed that genetic counselors have a professional obligation to be knowledgeable about direct-to-consumer genetic testing (55%) and interpret results (48%). Fifty-one percent of respondents thought genetic testing should be limited to a clinical setting; 56% agreed direct-to-consumer genetic testing is acceptable if genetic counseling is provided. More than 70% of respondents would definitely or possibly consider direct-to-consumer testing for patients who (1) have concerns about genetic discrimination, (2) want anonymous testing, or (3) have geographic constraints.

Conclusions: Results indicate that genetic counselors have limited patient experiences with direct-to-consumer genetic testing and are cautiously considering if and under what circumstances this approach should be used.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gollust SE, Wilfond BS, Hull SC. Direct-to-consumer sales of genetic services on the Internet. Genet Med. 2003;5:332–337. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hunter DJ, Khoury MJ, Drazen JM. Letting the genome out of the bottle— will we get our wish? N Engl J Med. 2008;358:105–107. - PubMed
    1. Offit K. Genomic profiles for disease risk: predictive or premature? JAMA. 2008;299:1353–1355. - PubMed
    1. Hogarth S, Javitt G, Melzer D. The current landscape for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: legal, ethical, and policy issues. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2008;9:161–182. - PubMed
    1. Genetics and Public Policy Center. Updated chart of direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies available. [Accessed March 30, 2010]; Available at: http://wwwdnapolicy.com/news.release.php?actiondetail&pressrelease_id137. Updated March 9, 2010.

Publication types