Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010:2010:467976.
doi: 10.1155/2010/467976. Epub 2010 Dec 23.

The Effect of Race, Sex, and Insurance Status on Time-to-Listing Decisions for Liver Transplantation

Affiliations

The Effect of Race, Sex, and Insurance Status on Time-to-Listing Decisions for Liver Transplantation

Cindy L Bryce et al. J Transplant. 2010.

Abstract

Fair allocation of organs to candidates listed for transplantation is fundamental to organ-donation policies. Processes leading to listing decisions are neither regulated nor understood. We explored whether patient characteristics affected timeliness of listing using population-based data on 144,507 adults hospitalized with liver-related disease in Pennsylvania. We linked hospitalizations to other secondary data and found 3,071 listed for transplants, 1,537 received transplants, and 57,020 died. Among candidates, 61% (n = 1,879) and 85.5% (n = 2,626) were listed within 1 and 3 years of diagnosis; 26.7% (n = 1,130) and 95% (n = 1,468) of recipients were transplanted within 1 and 3 years of listing. Using competing-risks models, we found few overall differences by sex, but both black patients and those insured by Medicare and Medicaid (combined) waited longer before being listed. Patients with combined Medicare and Medicaid insurance, as well as those with Medicaid alone, were also more likely to die without ever being listed. Once listed, the time to transplant was slightly longer for women, but it did not differ by race/ethnicity or insurance. The early time period from diagnosis to listing for liver transplantation reveals unwanted variation related to demographics that jeopardizes overall fairness of organ allocation and needs to be further explored.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Gender-related results in the adjusted competing risks model.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Race/ethnicity-based results in the adjusted competing risks model.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Insurance-based results in the adjusted competing risks model.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Gender-related results in the adjusted competing risks model. Abbreviations: PBC-primary biliary cirrhosis; PSC-primary sclerosing cholangitis; ALD-alcoholic liver disease.

References

    1. Majeske RA. Transforming objectivity to promote equity in transplant candidate selection. Theoretical Medicine. 1996;17(1):45–59. - PubMed
    1. Milford EL. Organ transplantationn—barriers, outcomes, and evolving policies. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1998;280(13):1184–1185. - PubMed
    1. Navaneethan SD, Singh S. A systematic review of barriers in access to renal transplantation among African Americans in the United States. Clinical Transplantation. 2006;20(6):769–775. - PubMed
    1. Ubel PA, Loewenstein G. Public perceptions of the importance of prognosis in allocating transplantable livers to children. Medical Decision Making. 1996;16(3):234–241. - PubMed
    1. Ubel PA, Caplan AL. Geographic favoritism in liver transplantation—unfortunate or unfair? The New England Journal of Medicine. 1998;339(18):1322–1325. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources