Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Apr;8(4):1228-38.
doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02164.x. Epub 2011 Jan 14.

Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover trial of treating erectile dysfunction with sildenafil after radiotherapy and short-term androgen deprivation therapy: results of RTOG 0215

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover trial of treating erectile dysfunction with sildenafil after radiotherapy and short-term androgen deprivation therapy: results of RTOG 0215

Deborah Watkins Bruner et al. J Sex Med. 2011 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction: Erectile dysfunction (ED) may be the most commonly observed adverse event (AE) associated with the combination of radiation therapy (RT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). A significant number of men are trying phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5s) such as sildenafil to treat ED, yet sildenafil studies to date shed little light on the response to ED after ADT.

Aim: The purpose of this trial was to evaluate sildenafil in the treatment of ED in prostate cancer patients previously treated with external beam RT and neoadjuvant and concurrent ADT.

Methods: In this randomized, double-blinded crossover trial, eligible patients received RT/ADT for intermediate risk prostate cancer and currently had ED as defined by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Patients were randomized to 12 weeks of sildenafil or placebo followed by 1 week of no treatment then 12 weeks of the alternative. Treatment differences were evaluated using a marginal model for binary crossover data.

Main outcome measures: The primary end point was improved erectile function, as measured by the IIEF.

Results: The study accrued 115 patients and 61 (55%) completed all three IIEF assessments. Sildenafil effect was significant (P = 0.009) with a difference in probabilities of erectile response of 0.17 (95% confidence interval: 0.06, 0.29), and 0.21 (0.06, 0.38) for patients receiving ≤ 120 days of ADT. However, as few as 21% of patients had a treatment-specific response, only improving during sildenafil but not during the placebo phase.

Conclusions: This is the first controlled trial to suggest a positive sildenafil response for ED treatment in patients previously treated with RT/ADT, however, only a minority of patients responded to treatment. ADT duration may be associated with response and requires further study. The overall low response rate suggests the need for study of additional or preventative strategies for ED after RT/ADT for prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Responses to International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Question 1 after each treatment. IIEF Q1: How often were you able to get an erection during sexual activity? Numbers in parentheses represent frequency counts. Responders (+) have score of: 4—most times or 5—almost always/always. n (x, y) represents response status to placebo and sildenafil treatments, respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scores at baseline and after each treatment. Scores: 0—no activity; 1—almost never/never; 2—a few times; 3—sometimes; 4—most times; 5—almost always/always. *IIEF Q1 (primary end point): how often were you able to get an erection during sexual activity? IIEF Q3: When attempting intercourse, how often were you able to penetrate your partner? IIEF Q4: During intercourse, how often were you able to maintain your erection after penetration? IIEF-erectile function (EF) domain score (Q1–Q5, Q15).

References

    1. Potosky A, Legler J, Albertsen PC, Stanford JL, Gilliland FD, Hamilton AS, Eley JW, Stephenson RA, Harlan LC. Health outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1582–92. - PubMed
    1. Little DJ, Kuban DA, Levy LB, Zagars GK, Pollack A. Quality-of-life questionnaire results 2 and 3 years after radiotherapy for prostate cancer in a randomized dose-escalation study. Urology. 2003;62:707–13. - PubMed
    1. van der Wielen GJ, van Putten WL, Incrocci L. Sexual function after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Results from a dose-escalation trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68:479–84. - PubMed
    1. Edwards BK, Brown ML, Wingo PA, Howe HL, Ward E, Ries LA, Schrag D, Jamison PM, Jemal A, Wu XC, Friedman C, Harlan L, Warren J, Anderson RN, Pickle LW. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1407–27. - PubMed
    1. D’Amico AV, Chen MH, Renshaw AA, Loffredo M, Kantoff PW. Androgen suppression and radiation vs radiation alone for prostate cancer: A randomized trial. JAMA. 2008;299:289–95. - PubMed

Publication types