A technical solution to improving palliative and hospice care
- PMID: 21240650
- DOI: 10.1007/s00520-011-1086-z
A technical solution to improving palliative and hospice care
Abstract
Purpose: This project sought to help palliative and hospice care practices improve patient care quality and operational efficiency by improving patient symptom status reporting and symptom management, reducing associated provider documentation workload, and enhancing patient-provider and provider-provider communication. We developed a user-friendly, electronic medical record-compatible, software prototype that allows typical clinical data and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) to be entered and stored. This data is immediately available during the clinical encounter with graphically depicted summaries for patient history and PRO assessments, a trending feature that links symptom behavior to interventions and the Edmonton Labeled Visual Information System.
Methods: A user-centered design approach allowed for iterative cycles of needs/usability feedback from providers and patients/caregivers to be incorporated into the development of our prototype's technical structure and features. To determine the needs and initial usability of the project's prototype, we interviewed eight providers and 18 patients/caregivers. Another usability test, consisting of patient/caregiver (n = 18) and provider (n = 9) interviews, assessed the functioning prototype's design, usability, and usefulness.
Results: Patients/caregivers (n = 18) reported that the prototype was usable (100%), it would facilitate patient-provider communication, shared decision making, and self-management (100%), and they would be willing to try the system and recommend it to their providers (100%). The providers (n = 9) felt that the prototype encouraged better use of patient assessments in decision making and patient care (100%) and improved identification of cause/temporal relationship between care events and outcomes (100%), monitoring of patient status (100%), communication in a multi-disciplinary team (100%), and operational efficiency and patient care quality (88.9%).
Conclusions: Quality of patient care and operational efficiency can be improved with an effective assessment, evaluation, and communication tool. This project developed an electronic version of such a tool. Future efforts will hone its usability and integration across multiple hospice/palliative care settings.
Similar articles
-
Tell Us™: a Web-based tool for improving communication among patients, families, and providers in hospice and palliative care through systematic data specification, collection, and use.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Oct;42(4):526-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.12.006. Epub 2011 Mar 31. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011. PMID: 21458214 Free PMC article.
-
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26447011
-
A Mobile App to Improve Symptom Control and Information Exchange Among Specialists and Local Health Workers Treating Tanzanian Cancer Patients: Human-Centered Design Approach.JMIR Cancer. 2021 Mar 23;7(1):e24062. doi: 10.2196/24062. JMIR Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33755022 Free PMC article.
-
Examining Interventions Designed to Support Shared Decision Making and Subsequent Patient Outcomes in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Jan;36(1):76-88. doi: 10.1177/1049909118783688. Epub 2018 Jun 20. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019. PMID: 29925244 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding Palliative Care and Hospice: A Review for Primary Care Providers.Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Feb;92(2):280-286. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.11.007. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017. PMID: 28160875 Review.
Cited by
-
Electronic real-time assessment of patient-reported outcomes in routine care-first findings and experiences from the implementation in a comprehensive cancer center.Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jul;24(7):3047-56. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3127-0. Epub 2016 Feb 18. Support Care Cancer. 2016. PMID: 26887586
-
An appraisal of published usability evaluations of electronic health records via systematic review.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jan;24(1):218-226. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw046. Epub 2016 Apr 23. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017. PMID: 27107451 Free PMC article.
-
A Proposed Patient-Inclusive Methodology for Developing and Validating Telehealth Surveys that Include Social Determinants of Health.AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2022 Feb 21;2021:565-570. eCollection 2021. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2022. PMID: 35308979 Free PMC article.
-
What are the attitudes of health professionals regarding patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in oncology practice? A mixed-method synthesis of the qualitative evidence.BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4939-7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020. PMID: 32041593 Free PMC article.
-
Usability and Acceptability of the QDACT-PC, an Electronic Point-of-Care System for Standardized Quality Monitoring in Palliative Care.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Nov;50(5):615-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.05.013. Epub 2015 Jul 10. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015. PMID: 26166184 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical