Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan;20(1):167-74.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1086-z. Epub 2011 Jan 16.

A technical solution to improving palliative and hospice care

Affiliations

A technical solution to improving palliative and hospice care

Michael A Kallen et al. Support Care Cancer. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: This project sought to help palliative and hospice care practices improve patient care quality and operational efficiency by improving patient symptom status reporting and symptom management, reducing associated provider documentation workload, and enhancing patient-provider and provider-provider communication. We developed a user-friendly, electronic medical record-compatible, software prototype that allows typical clinical data and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) to be entered and stored. This data is immediately available during the clinical encounter with graphically depicted summaries for patient history and PRO assessments, a trending feature that links symptom behavior to interventions and the Edmonton Labeled Visual Information System.

Methods: A user-centered design approach allowed for iterative cycles of needs/usability feedback from providers and patients/caregivers to be incorporated into the development of our prototype's technical structure and features. To determine the needs and initial usability of the project's prototype, we interviewed eight providers and 18 patients/caregivers. Another usability test, consisting of patient/caregiver (n = 18) and provider (n = 9) interviews, assessed the functioning prototype's design, usability, and usefulness.

Results: Patients/caregivers (n = 18) reported that the prototype was usable (100%), it would facilitate patient-provider communication, shared decision making, and self-management (100%), and they would be willing to try the system and recommend it to their providers (100%). The providers (n = 9) felt that the prototype encouraged better use of patient assessments in decision making and patient care (100%) and improved identification of cause/temporal relationship between care events and outcomes (100%), monitoring of patient status (100%), communication in a multi-disciplinary team (100%), and operational efficiency and patient care quality (88.9%).

Conclusions: Quality of patient care and operational efficiency can be improved with an effective assessment, evaluation, and communication tool. This project developed an electronic version of such a tool. Future efforts will hone its usability and integration across multiple hospice/palliative care settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Oncology. 2008;74 Suppl 1:24-34 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1984 Oct 12;252(14):1905-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Psychiatry. 1974 Oct;131(10):1121-3 - PubMed
    1. J Palliat Med. 2005 Dec;8(6):1176-85 - PubMed
    1. J Med Liban. 2008 Apr-Jun;56(2):129-31 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources