Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Feb;141(2):345-53.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.10.015.

Effects of different annuloplasty ring types on mitral leaflet tenting area during acute myocardial ischemia

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Effects of different annuloplasty ring types on mitral leaflet tenting area during acute myocardial ischemia

Wolfgang Bothe et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: The study objective was to quantify the effects of different annuloplasty rings on mitral leaflet septal-lateral tenting areas during acute myocardial ischemia.

Methods: Radiopaque markers were implanted along the central septal-lateral meridian of the mitral valve in 30 sheep: 1 each to the septal and lateral aspects of the mitral annulus and 4 and 2 along the anterior and posterior mitral leaflets, respectively. Ten true-sized Carpentier-Edwards Physio, Edwards IMR ETLogix, and GeoForm annuloplasty rings (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, Calif) were inserted in a releasable fashion. Marker coordinates were obtained using biplane videofluoroscopy with ring inserted at baseline (RING_BL) and after 90 seconds of left circumflex artery occlusion (RING_ISCH). After ring release, another dataset was acquired before (No_Ring_BL) and after left circumflex artery occlusion (No_Ring_ISCH). Anterior and posterior mitral leaflet tenting areas were computed at mid-systole from sums of marker triangles with the midpoint between the annular markers being the vertex for all triangles.

Results: Compared with No_Ring_BL, mitral regurgitation grades and all tenting areas significantly increased with No_Ring_ISCH. Compared with No_Ring_ISCH, (1) all rings significantly prevented mitral regurgitation and reduced all tenting areas; (2) Edwards IMR ETLogix and GeoForm rings reduced posterior mitral leaflet area, but not anterior mitral leaflet tenting area, to a significantly greater extent than the Carpentier-Edwards Physio ring; and (3) Edwards IMR ETLogix and GeoForm rings affected tenting areas similarly.

Conclusions: In response to acute left ventricular ischemia, disease-specific functional/ischemic mitral regurgitation rings (Edwards IMR ETLogix, GeoForm) more effectively reduced posterior mitral leaflet area, but not anterior mitral leaflet tenting area, compared with true-sized physiologic rings (Carpentier-Edwards Physio). Despite its radical 3-dimensional shape and greater amount of mitral annular septal-lateral downsizing, the GeoForm ring did not reduce tenting areas more than the Edwards IMR ETLogix ring, suggesting that further reduction in tenting areas in patients with FMR/IMR may not be effectively achieved on an annular level.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematics depicting the A: marker array used to delineate the septal-lateral (S-L) aspects of the mitral annulus (#22 and 18), anterior mitral leaflet (AML, #A1–4) and posterior mitral leaflet (PML, #P1 and 2); B: calculation of AML and PML tenting areas; C: experimental protocol timeline (see METHODS for details).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Total, anterior and posterior mitral leaflet (AML and PML, respectively) septal-lateral (S-L) tenting areas in animals from all three groups with no ring implanted under baseline conditions and during acute postero-lateral LV ischemia.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Total, anterior and posterior mitral leaflet (AML and PML, respectively) septal-lateral (S-L) tenting areas in animals from all three groups during acute postero-lateral LV ischemia with and without annuloplasty ring (A-C) and with annuloplasty rings implanted under baseline conditions and during ischemia (D-F).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relative changes in tenting area (A) and mitral annular diameters (B) between the respective experimental conditions (see METHODS for details).

References

    1. Kwan J, Shiota T, Agler DA, Popovic ZB, Qin JX, Gillinov MA, et al. Geometric differences of the mitral apparatus between ischemic and dilated cardiomyopathy with significant mitral regurgitation: real-time three-dimensional echocardiography study. Circulation. 2003;107:1135–1140. - PubMed
    1. Gelsomino S, Lorusso R, De Cicco G, Capecchi I, Rostagno C, Caciolli S, et al. Five-year echocardiographic results of combined undersized mitral ring annuloplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting for chronic ischaemic mitral regurgitation. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:231–240. - PubMed
    1. Braun J, van de Veire NR, Klautz RJ, Versteegh MI, Holman ER, Westenberg JJ, et al. Restrictive mitral annuloplasty cures ischemic mitral regurgitation and heart failure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:430–436. discussion 436-7. - PubMed
    1. Watanabe N, Ogasawara Y, Yamaura Y, Yamamoto K, Wada N, Kawamoto T, et al. Geometric differences of the mitral valve tenting between anterior and inferior myocardial infarction with significant ischemic mitral regurgitation: quantitation by novel software system with transthoracic real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006;19:71–75. - PubMed
    1. Daimon M, Fukuda S, Adams DH, McCarthy PM, Gillinov AM, Carpentier A, et al. Mitral valve repair with Carpentier-McCarthy-Adams IMR ETlogix annuloplasty ring for ischemic mitral regurgitation: early echocardiographic results from a multi-center study. Circulation. 2006;114:I588–I593. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms