Reversal of severe heart failure with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device and pharmacological therapy: a prospective study
- PMID: 21242487
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.933960
Reversal of severe heart failure with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device and pharmacological therapy: a prospective study
Abstract
Background: We have previously shown that a specific combination of drug therapy and left ventricular assist device unloading results in significant myocardial recovery, sufficient to allow pump removal, in two thirds of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy receiving a Heartmate I pulsatile device. However, this protocol has not been used with nonpulsatile devices.
Methods and results: We report the results of a prospective study of 20 patients who received a combination of angiotensin-converting enzymes, β-blockers, angiotensin II inhibitors, and aldosterone antagonists followed by the β₂-agonist clenbuterol and were regularly tested (echocardiograms, exercise tests, catheterizations) with the pump at low speed. Before left ventricular assist device insertion, patient age was 35.2 ± 12.6 years (16 male patients), patients were on 2.0 ± 0.9 inotropes, 7 (35) had an intra-aortic balloon pump, 2 were hemofiltered, 2 were ventilated, 3 had a prior Levitronix device, and 1 had extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Cardiac index was 1.39 ± 0.43 L · min⁻¹ · m⁻², pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was 31.5 ± 5.7 mm Hg, and heart failure history was 3.4 ± 3.5 years. One patient was lost to follow-up and died after 240 days of support. Of the remaining 19 patients, 12 (63.2) were explanted after 286 ± 97 days. Eight had symptomatic heart failure for ≤6 months and 4 for >6 months (48 to 132 months). Before explantation, at low flow for 15 minutes, ejection fraction was 70 ± 7, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was 48.6 ± 5.7 mm, left ventricular end-systolic diameter was 32.3 ± 5.7 mm, mV(O₂) was 21.6 ± 4 mL · kg⁻¹ · min⁻¹, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was 5.9 ± 4.6 mm Hg, and cardiac index was 3.6 ± 0.6 L · min⁻¹ · m⁻². Estimated survival without heart failure recurrence was 83.3 at 1 and 3 years. After a 430.7 ± 337.1-day follow-up, surviving explants had an ejection fraction of 58.1 ± 13.8, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter of 59.0 ± 9.3 mm, left ventricular end-systolic diameter of 42.0 ± 10.7 mm, and mV(O₂) of 22.6 ± 5.3 mL · kg⁻¹ · min⁻¹.
Conclusions: Reversal of end-stage heart failure secondary to nonischemic cardiomyopathy can be achieved in a substantial proportion of patients with nonpulsatile flow through the use of a combination of mechanical and pharmacological therapy.
Comment in
-
Cardiac recovery during continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support: some good news from across the Atlantic.Circulation. 2011 Feb 1;123(4):355-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.005199. Epub 2011 Jan 17. Circulation. 2011. PMID: 21242486 No abstract available.
-
Device therapy: LVADs as a bridge to recovery.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011 Mar;8(3):120. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2011.14. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21475317 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Right ventricular failure in patients with the HeartMate II continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: incidence, risk factors, and effect on outcomes.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 May;139(5):1316-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.11.020. Epub 2010 Feb 4. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010. PMID: 20132950
-
Midterm follow-up of patients who underwent removal of a left ventricular assist device after cardiac recovery from end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Nov;120(5):843-53. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2000.108931. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000. PMID: 11044309
-
Effects of pulsatile- and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices on left ventricular unloading.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008 Mar;27(3):261-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.12.001. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008. PMID: 18342746
-
Stage B heart failure: management of asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction.Circulation. 2006 Jun 20;113(24):2851-60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.600437. Circulation. 2006. PMID: 16785351 Review. No abstract available.
-
HeartMate II left ventricular assist device: a new device for advanced heart failure.Expert Rev Med Devices. 2005 Sep;2(5):529-32. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2.5.529. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2005. PMID: 16293063 Review.
Cited by
-
Left ventricular assist device recovery: does duration of mechanical support matter?Heart Fail Rev. 2019 Mar;24(2):237-244. doi: 10.1007/s10741-018-9744-6. Heart Fail Rev. 2019. PMID: 30302658 Review.
-
Mechanical circulatory support for patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy.J Artif Organs. 2016 Sep;19(3):305-9. doi: 10.1007/s10047-016-0891-z. Epub 2016 Mar 22. J Artif Organs. 2016. PMID: 27003430
-
Cardiac Reverse Remodeling Mediated by HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device: Comparison to Older Generation Devices.ASAIO J. 2024 Dec 1;70(12):1060-1066. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002245. Epub 2024 May 28. ASAIO J. 2024. PMID: 38810218
-
Evidence of clinical efficacy of counterpulsation therapy methods.Heart Fail Rev. 2015 May;20(3):323-35. doi: 10.1007/s10741-014-9468-1. Heart Fail Rev. 2015. PMID: 25515152 Review.
-
Evidence for synergy between sarcomeres and fibroblasts in an in vitro model of myocardial reverse remodeling.J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2021 Sep;158:11-25. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2021.05.005. Epub 2021 May 14. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2021. PMID: 33992697 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous