Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Jan-Feb;9(1):3-11.
doi: 10.1370/afm.1197.

Effect of preventive messages tailored to family history on health behaviors: the Family Healthware Impact Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of preventive messages tailored to family history on health behaviors: the Family Healthware Impact Trial

Mack T Ruffin 4th et al. Ann Fam Med. 2011 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: We wanted to determine the impact of automated family history assessment and tailored messages for coronary heart disease, stroke, diabetes, colorectal, breast, and ovarian cancer on preventive behaviors compared with a standard preventive message.

Methods: The study was a cluster-randomized clinical trial that included 41 primary care practices, the majority in the Midwest, using Family Healthware, a self-administered, Web-based tool that assesses familial risk for the diseases and provides personalized risk-tailored messages. Patients in the control group received an age- and sex-specific health message related to lifestyle and screening. Smoking cessation, fruit and vegetable intake, physical activity, aspirin use, blood pressure, and cholesterol and blood glucose screening were assessed at baseline and 6 months after the intervention.

Results: Of 4,248 participants, 3,344 (78%) completed the study. Participants were white (91%), female (70%), and insured (97%), and had a mean age of 50.6 years (range 35-65 years). Intervention participants were more likely to increase daily fruit and vegetable consumption from 5 or fewer servings a day to 5 or more servings a day (OR = 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.58) and to increase physical activity (OR = 1.47; 95% CI, 1.08-1.98) to 5 to 6 times a week for 30 minutes or more a week. The absolute differences in proportion were 3% and 4%, respectively. Intervention participants were less likely to move from not having cholesterol screening in the last 5 years to having their cholesterol measured within 5 years (OR = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.17-0.67), with an absolute difference of 15%.

Conclusions: Messages tailored to an individual's familial risk for 6 common diseases modestly increased self-reported physical activity and fruit and vegetable intake but reduced the likelihood of receiving cholesterol screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Conceptual model of how tailored messages on family risk status and recommended preventive strategies would result in behavioral changes.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Consort diagram of practice and participant recruitment.

References

    1. Yoon PW, Chen B, Faucett A, et al. Public health impact of genetic tests at the end of the 20th century. Genet Med. 2001;3(6):405–410. - PubMed
    1. Khoury MJ, Gwinn M. What role for public health in genetics and vice versa? Community Genet. 2006;9(4):282, author reply 283. - PubMed
    1. Khoury MJ. Genetics and genomics in practice: the continuum from genetic disease to genetic information in health and disease. Genet Med. 2003;5(4):261–268. - PubMed
    1. Williams RR, Hunt SC, Heiss G, et al. Usefulness of cardiovascular family history data for population-based preventive medicine and medical research (the Health Family Tree Study and the NHLBI Family Heart Study). Am J Cardiol. 2001;87(2):129–135. - PubMed
    1. Acheson LS, Wiesner GL, Zyzanski SJ, Goodwin MA, Stange KC. Family history-taking in community family practice: implications for genetic screening. Genet Med. 2000;2(3):180–185. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms