Estimating the Influence of Cochlear Implantation on Language Development in Children
- PMID: 21243079
- PMCID: PMC3020793
- DOI: 10.1080/16513860701659404
Estimating the Influence of Cochlear Implantation on Language Development in Children
Abstract
Research studies reviewed here have identified a wide variety of factors that may influence a child's auditory, speech and language development following cochlear implantation. Intrinsic characteristics of the implanted child, including gender, family socio-economic status, age at onset of hearing loss and pre-implant residual hearing may predispose a child to greater or lesser post-implant benefit. Intervention characteristics that may influence outcome include age of the child when deafness is identified and amplification and habilitation is initiated, the communication mode used with the child and the type of classroom/therapy employed. Characteristics of the implant itself include generation of technology used, the age of the child when implant stimulation is initiated, and the amount of time the child has used the implant. These factors interact in unpredictable ways, so that isolated correlations between predictor variables and outcome scores may be difficult to interpret. Results for two independent samples of orally-educated children tested by different laboratories were compared using multiple regression analysis to illustrate interactions among predictor variables. Four predictor variables accounted for a similar proportion of variance (23% and 24%) in receptive vocabulary (PPVT) outcome scores in each sample. A unique predictor was then added to each analysis. The addition of pre-implant aided threshold not only increased the total variance accounted for to almost 40%, but also increased the effect of implant age as a predictor variable. A different result was observed in the other sample, were the added predictor variable was nonverbal IQ, where the estimated contribution of implant age was reduced. The current analysis suggests that future analyses minimally control for independent contributions of implant age, nonverbal IQ, and pre-implant aided thresholds when examining expected outcomes. Children in both samples who received a cochlear implant sometime between their first and second birthday achieved age-appropriate oral receptive vocabulary levels during preschool.
Similar articles
-
Effects of early auditory experience on the spoken language of deaf children at 3 years of age.Ear Hear. 2006 Jun;27(3):286-98. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000215973.76912.c6. Ear Hear. 2006. PMID: 16672797 Free PMC article.
-
Language skills of children with early cochlear implantation.Ear Hear. 2003 Feb;24(1 Suppl):46S-58S. doi: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000051689.57380.1B. Ear Hear. 2003. PMID: 12612480
-
Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five.Ear Hear. 2003 Feb;24(1 Suppl):24S-35S. doi: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000051687.99218.0F. Ear Hear. 2003. PMID: 12612478
-
Implantable Devices for Single-Sided Deafness and Conductive or Mixed Hearing Loss: A Health Technology Assessment.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Mar 6;20(1):1-165. eCollection 2020. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020. PMID: 32194878 Free PMC article.
-
Identification of Pure-Tone Audiologic Thresholds for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Candidacy: A Systematic Review.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Jul 1;144(7):630-638. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.0652. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018. PMID: 29800000
Cited by
-
The effect of GJB2 and SLC26A4 gene mutations on rehabilitative outcomes in pediatric cochlear implant patients.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Nov;270(11):2865-70. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2330-y. Epub 2013 Jan 8. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013. PMID: 23296490
-
Cochlear Implants: Evaluation of Effects of Various Parameters on Outcomes in Pediatric Patients at a Tertiary Care Centre for Unilateral Ear Implantation.Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Aug;74(Suppl 1):360-367. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-02129-9. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022. PMID: 36032881 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of Cochlear Implant Interval on Spoken Language Skills of Pediatric Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.Otol Neurotol. 2019 Jul;40(6):e600-e605. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002245. Otol Neurotol. 2019. PMID: 31135675 Free PMC article.
-
Categories of auditory performance and speech intelligibility ratings of early-implanted children without speech training.PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053852. Epub 2013 Jan 21. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23349752 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy to Predict and Measure Cochlear Implant Outcomes: A Scoping Review.Brain Sci. 2021 Oct 28;11(11):1439. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11111439. Brain Sci. 2021. PMID: 34827438 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Boothroyd A, Geers A, Moog J. Practical implications of cochlear implants in children. Ear and Hearing. 1991;12(Suppl):81–9. - PubMed
-
- Dawson PW, Blamey PJ, Dettman SJ, Barker EJ, Clark GM. A clinical report on receptive vocabulary skills in cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing. 1995 Jun;16(3):287–94. - PubMed
-
- Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey A, Coulter D, Mehl A. Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics. 1998;102:1161–71. - PubMed
-
- Geers A, Moog JS. Factors predictive of the development of literacy in hearing-impaired adolescents. Volta Review. 1989;91(2):69–86.
-
- Moog J, Geers A. EPIC: A program to accelerate academic progress in profoundly hearing-impaired children. Volta Review. 1985;87:259–77.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources