Extra Z-axis coverage at CT imaging resulting in excess radiation dose: frequency, degree, and contributory factors
- PMID: 21245690
- PMCID: PMC3461585
- DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181f5a652
Extra Z-axis coverage at CT imaging resulting in excess radiation dose: frequency, degree, and contributory factors
Abstract
Objective: To assess the degree of extra scanning beyond the prescribed anatomic boundaries for thoracic and body computed tomographic (CT) scans and to identify associated factors.
Methods: For 442 consecutive chest, abdomen, and/or pelvis CT examinations, the length of extra scanning beyond the prescribed anatomic boundaries was determined. Examinations were grouped according to the locations/types of the prescribed boundaries and compared with regard to length of extra scanning.
Results: Of 442 CT examinations, 438 (99%) included extraneous imaging, showing a mean excess scanning length of 43.2 mm per examination (range, 0-180 mm). Significantly more extraneous imaging was performed when soft tissue or vascular structures defined anatomic boundaries compared to when osseous (P < 0.001) or air/soft tissue interfaces (P < 0.0001) defined the boundaries. The average percent of total scan dose attributable to extra imaging was 8.64% to 10.38%.
Conclusions: Computed tomographic scanning beyond the prescribed anatomic boundaries occurs commonly, resulting in moderate extra radiation dose.
Figures
References
-
- Prochaska G. Latest IMV CT Census Shows Slow-down in Expenditures for CT Technology. 2008 Mar 24; In: Reuters http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS71937+24-Mar-2008+Bw2008....
-
- Lauer MS. Elements of danger--the case of medical imaging. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:841–843. - PubMed
-
- Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, et al. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology. 2004;230:619–628. - PubMed
-
- Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, Kujak J, Pavlicek W. Innovations in CT Dose Reduction Strategy: Application of the Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:191–199. - PubMed
