Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Dec;107(50):892-8.
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0892. Epub 2010 Dec 17.

Modern triage in the emergency department

Affiliations
Review

Modern triage in the emergency department

Michael Christ et al. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Because the volume of patient admissions to an emergency department (ED) cannot be precisely planned, the available resources may become overwhelmed at times ("crowding"), with resulting risks for patient safety. The aim of this study is to identify modern triage instruments and assess their validity and reliability.

Methods: Review of selected literature retrieved by a search on the terms "emergency department" and "triage."

Results: Emergency departments around the world use different triage systems to assess the severity of incoming patients' conditions and assign treatment priorities. Our study identified four such instruments: the Australasian Triage Scale (ATS), the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS), the Manchester Triage System (MTS), and the Emergency Severity Index (ESI). Triage instruments with 5 levels are superior to those with 3 levels in both validity and reliability (p<0.01). Good to very good reliability has been shown for the best-studied instruments, CTAS and ESI (κ-statistics: 0.7 to 0.95), while ATS and MTS have been found to be only moderately reliable (κ-statistics: 0.3 to 0.6). MTS and ESI are both available in German; of these two, only the ESI has been validated in German-speaking countries.

Conclusion: Five-level triage systems are valid and reliable methods for assessment of the severity of incoming patients' conditions by nursing staff in the emergency department. They should be used in German emergency departments to assign treatment priorities in a structured and dependable fashion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Emergency departments of Nuremberg Hospital (Nuremberg Hospital South: dark bars; Nuremberg Hospital North: light bars):
Figure 2
Figure 2
Triage algorithm of the Emergency Severity Index, version 4. An accompanying brief description of this algorithm (8) supports the members of staff concerned during the triage process. The triage system is explained in detail in the original English handbook (6). At decision point D (danger zone vitals?) there are defined age-dependent thresholds (m, months; y, years) for heart rate (HR) in beats per minute, respiratory rate (RR) in breaths per minute, and oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2). If these thresholds are exceeded, the triage nurse may decide to assign the patient to a higher priority level.

Comment in

References

    1. Pitts SR, Niska RW, Xu J, Burt CW. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2006 emergency department summary. Natl Health Stat Report. 2008:1–38. - PubMed
    1. Steffen W, Tempka A, Klute G. Falsche Patientenanreize in der Ersten Hilfe der Krankenhäuser. Dtsch Arztebl. 2007;104:1088–1091.
    1. Schellein O, Ludwig-Pistor F, Bremerich DH. Manchester triage system: Process optimization in the interdisciplinary emergency department. Anaesthesist. 2008;58:163–170. - PubMed
    1. Rutschmann OT, Siber RS, Hugli OW. Empfehlung der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Notfall- und Rettungsmedizin (SGNOR) zur Triage in Schweizer Notfallstationen. Schweiz Ärztezeitung. 2009;90:1–2.
    1. Fernandes CM, Tanabe P, Gilboy N, et al. Five-level triage: a report from the ACEP/ENA Five-level Triage Task Force. J Emerg Nurs. 2005;31:39–50. - PubMed

MeSH terms