Regional bond strength to lateral walls in class I and II ceramic inlays luted with four resin cements and glass-ionomer luting agent
- PMID: 21246071
- DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a19816
Regional bond strength to lateral walls in class I and II ceramic inlays luted with four resin cements and glass-ionomer luting agent
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate regional shear bond strength to lateral walls of ceramic inlays in occlusal and occlusoproximal cavities using etch-and-rinse and self-adhesive resin cements and a glass-ionomer luting agent.
Materials and methods: IPS e.max Press ceramic inlays were made in 50 Class I and 50 Class II standardized cavities in intact extracted human molars and divided into 5 luting agent subgroups (n = 10): Variolink II (VL); Multilink Sprint (MLS); Multilink Automix (MLA); RelyX Unicem (RLX), and Ketac Cem Aplicap (KC). Inlays were pre-etched with IPS Ceramic etching gel for 60s. After 48 h, two disks of ca 1.0 mm thickness, one of superficial and the other of deep dentin, were push-out tested in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. The mode of failure was determined under a stereomicroscope at 20X. Data were analyzed with one way ANOVA, and Scheffé's test was used for post-hoc comparisons (α = 0.05).
Results: There were no significant differences in shear bond strength between Class I and Class II cavities for the dual-curing system in light-curing mode (VL=MLS=RLX), except that RLX demonstrated greater bond strength to deep dentin in Class II cavities. Bond strength values were significantly higher on deep than on superficial dentin. KC showed the worst result. Failures were mixed (adhesive/cohesive) for the resin luting cements and solely adhesive (cement/ceramic) for the glass-ionomer luting agent.
Conclusion: Dual-curing etch-and-rinse or self-etching self-adhesive resin luting cements achieved greater bond strength when light curing was applied, with no differences between Class I and Class II cavities but higher values for deep vs superficial dentin. The weakest adhesion was obtained with glass-ionomer luting agent in both cavity types.
Similar articles
-
Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.Oper Dent. 2011 May-Jun;36(3):266-73. doi: 10.2341/10-236-L. Epub 2011 Jul 8. Oper Dent. 2011. PMID: 21740244
-
Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements.Dent Mater. 2008 Feb;24(2):185-91. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.04.003. Epub 2007 Jun 1. Dent Mater. 2008. PMID: 17544101
-
Shear bond strength of porcelain laminate veneers to enamel, dentine and enamel-dentine complex bonded with different adhesive luting systems.J Dent. 2013 Feb;41(2):97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.04.005. Epub 2012 Apr 19. J Dent. 2013. PMID: 22521701 Clinical Trial.
-
Dental Luting Cements: An Updated Comprehensive Review.Molecules. 2023 Feb 8;28(4):1619. doi: 10.3390/molecules28041619. Molecules. 2023. PMID: 36838607 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical reliability of self-adhesive luting resins compared to other adhesive procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Dent. 2023 Feb;129:104394. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104394. Epub 2022 Dec 22. J Dent. 2023. PMID: 36566829
Cited by
-
Antibacterial Effect of Ozone on Cariogenic Bacteria and Its Potential Prejudicial Effect on Dentin Bond Strength-An In Vitro Study.Pharmaceutics. 2024 May 2;16(5):614. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16050614. Pharmaceutics. 2024. PMID: 38794276 Free PMC article.
-
Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays.Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Apr;17(3):739-50. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0762-9. Epub 2012 Jun 17. Clin Oral Investig. 2013. PMID: 22707232 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources