Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review

Creating Safety in the Testing Process in Primary Care Offices

In: Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 2: Culture and Redesign). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 Aug.
Free Books & Documents
Review

Creating Safety in the Testing Process in Primary Care Offices

Nancy C. Elder et al.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

Background: The testing process in primary care is complex, and it varies from one office to another. We sought to understand how family medicine offices create safety in this process. Methods: Using observations, interviews, and surveys, we collected data at four family medicine offices. We searched the interview and observation notes for stories of safety, error prevention, and recovery and coded them to a model of resilient engineering properties, work system components, and testing process steps. Results: We found only six examples of practices that were systematically creating safety in the testing process via organizational resilience. The most common resilience properties were top-level commitment and a learning culture applied to work system components of people and their tasks. Offices predominantly depended on individuals to double-check, remember, and work around ongoing problems. Conclusions: While family medicine offices overwhelming depend on individuals to work around testing process problems, important properties of office-wide safety practices included a top-level commitment and a learning culture.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Beasley JW, Escoto KH, Karsh BT. Human factors and ergonomics in primary care. In: Carayon P, editor. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics in health care and patient safety. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2007.
    1. Carayon P, Schoofs Hundt A, Karsh BT, et al. Work system design for patient safety: The SEIPS model. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15( Suppl 1):i50–i58. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001. - PubMed
    1. Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988;260:1743–1748. - PubMed
    1. Feifer C, Nemeth L, Nietert PJ, et al. Different paths to high-quality care: Three archetypes of top-performing practice sites. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5:233–241. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources