Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review

The Rural Physician Peer Review Model©: A Virtual Solution

In: Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 2: Culture and Redesign). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 Aug.
Affiliations
Free Books & Documents
Review

The Rural Physician Peer Review Model©: A Virtual Solution

Josie R. Williams et al.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

Evaluating quality of care through peer review is a challenge for physicians. Rural physicians have the added burden of close personal relationships and conflicts of interest. The Rural Physician Peer Review Model© presents an innovative solution to these problems that involves utilizing simple information technology to share HIPAA-compliant information, a systems approach to review, principles of patient safety/quality of care, and continuing education. The process involves network hospitals submitting patient cases to the central staff, deidentifying patient information, e-transmitting the cases, meeting by teleconference, and report writing by the physician moderator. Over 3 years, 934 patient cases have been reviewed in 209 teleconferences. Participating physicians report high levels of satisfaction with the objectivity of the reviews and new learning. Written evaluations of the teleconferences document that this impartial process promotes the inclusion of quality improvement and patient safety in peer review. Anecdotal evidence indicates increased use of system improvements.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Freeman S. Best practices for enhancing quality. Patient Saf Qual Health. 2007. [Accessed June 19, 2008]. online. Available at: www.psqh.com/janfeb07/peer.html.
    1. Merry MD, Crago MG. The past, present and future of health care quality: Urgent need for innovative, external review processes to protect patients. Physician Exec. 2001;27:30–35. - PubMed
    1. Takayanagi K, Koseki K, Aruga T. Preventable trauma deaths: Evaluation by peer review and a guide for quality improvement. Clin Perform Qual Health Care. 1998;6:163–167. - PubMed
    1. Beyer M, Gerlach FM, Flies U, et al. The development of quality circles/peer review groups as a method of quality improvement in Europe. Results of a survey in 26 European countries. Fam Pract. 2003;20:443–451. - PubMed
    1. Nijm LM. 2003 Schwartz Award. Pitfalls of peer review. The limited protections of state and federal peer review law for physicians. J Leg Med. 2003;24:541–556. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources