Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review

Using Six Sigma® Methodology to Improve Handoff Communication in High-Risk Patients

In: Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 3: Performance and Tools). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 Aug.
Affiliations
Free Books & Documents
Review

Using Six Sigma® Methodology to Improve Handoff Communication in High-Risk Patients

Kshitij P. Mistry et al.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

Background: During the analyses of adverse events, a commonly described risk factor is the sharing of patient information. Objective: The objective for this project was to better understand and improve the postoperative handoff process for children with heart disease. Methods: The existing handoff process was evaluated and improved using Six Sigma® methodology and medical simulation training. Time-based metrics were compared before and after implementing performance improvement initiatives. Results: 29 pre- and 142 post-intervention handoff events were studied. Initiatives resulted in a reduced handoff turnaround time (15.3 min to 9.6 min; P <0.001) and time to obtaining critical laboratory studies (13.0 min to 2.4 min; P <0.001); an increase in chest radiographs completed (60 percent vs. 94 percent; P <0.01) and percent of patients placed on cardio-respiratory monitoring (86 percent vs. 99 percent; P <0.01) within unit standards. Conclusion: In children undergoing surgical intervention, performance improvement principles can improve the handoff process and decrease the delay of time-sensitive therapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kohn L, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. To err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1999. - PubMed
    1. Helmreich RL, Foushee HC. Why crew resource management? Empirical and theoretical bases of human factors training in aviation. In: Weiner EL, Kanki BG, Helmreich RL, editors. Cockpit resource management. San Diego: Academic Press; 1993. pp. 3–45.
    1. Helmreich RL. On error management: Lessons from aviation. Br Med J. 2000;320:781–785. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reason J. Understanding adverse events: Human factors. Qual Health Care. 1995;4:80–89. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reason J. Human error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1990.

LinkOut - more resources