Using Six Sigma® Methodology to Improve Handoff Communication in High-Risk Patients
- PMID: 21249919
- Bookshelf ID: NBK43658
Using Six Sigma® Methodology to Improve Handoff Communication in High-Risk Patients
Excerpt
Background: During the analyses of adverse events, a commonly described risk factor is the sharing of patient information. Objective: The objective for this project was to better understand and improve the postoperative handoff process for children with heart disease. Methods: The existing handoff process was evaluated and improved using Six Sigma® methodology and medical simulation training. Time-based metrics were compared before and after implementing performance improvement initiatives. Results: 29 pre- and 142 post-intervention handoff events were studied. Initiatives resulted in a reduced handoff turnaround time (15.3 min to 9.6 min; P <0.001) and time to obtaining critical laboratory studies (13.0 min to 2.4 min; P <0.001); an increase in chest radiographs completed (60 percent vs. 94 percent; P <0.01) and percent of patients placed on cardio-respiratory monitoring (86 percent vs. 99 percent; P <0.01) within unit standards. Conclusion: In children undergoing surgical intervention, performance improvement principles can improve the handoff process and decrease the delay of time-sensitive therapies.
Sections
References
-
- Kohn L, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. To err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1999. - PubMed
-
- Helmreich RL, Foushee HC. Why crew resource management? Empirical and theoretical bases of human factors training in aviation. In: Weiner EL, Kanki BG, Helmreich RL, editors. Cockpit resource management. San Diego: Academic Press; 1993. pp. 3–45.
-
- Reason J. Human error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources