Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review

Understanding Quality and Safety Problems in the Ambulatory Environment: Seeking Improvement With Promising Teamwork Tools and Strategies

In: Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 3: Performance and Tools). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 Aug.
Affiliations
Free Books & Documents
Review

Understanding Quality and Safety Problems in the Ambulatory Environment: Seeking Improvement With Promising Teamwork Tools and Strategies

John S. Webster et al.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

Despite 1.2 billion ambulatory visits in 2005, from a health care quality and safety perspective, the ambulatory setting has been less subject to research and scrutiny, compared to high-risk inpatient areas like surgery, perioperative and perinatal care, and the emergency department (ED). The ambulatory environment is prone to problems and errors that include missed/delayed diagnoses, delay of proper treatment or preventive services, medication errors/adverse drug events, and ineffective communication and information flow. Once there is clarity about the nature of outpatient errors, evidence-based teamwork tools, strategies, behaviors, and principles can be implemented as countermeasures to elements of the error chain. From the resources of the TeamSTEPPS™ initiative, six effective and evidence-based tools and strategies are offered for use by clinicians in the ambulatory setting to improve the quality and safety of patient care by improving teamwork and communication.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Burt CW, McCaig LF, Rechtsteiner EA. Ambulatory medical care utilization estimates for 2005. Hyattsville, MD: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Center for Health Statistics; 2005. [Accessed March 5, 2008]. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ad/ad388.pdf.
    1. Owings MF, Kozak LJ. Ambulatory and inpatient procedures in the United States, 1996. Hyattsville, MD: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Center for Health Statistics; 1996. [Accessed March 5, 2008]. Available at: www.cdc.gov/NCHS/data/series/sr_13/sr13_139.pdf.
    1. Wilson KA, Burke CS, Priest HA, et al. Promoting health care safety through training high reliability teams. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:303–309. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pace WD, Fernald DH, Harris DM, et al. Advances in patient safety: From research to implementation. Vol. 2, Concepts and methodology. AHRQ Pub. 05-0021-2. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2005. [Accessed March 5, 2008]. Developing a taxonomy for coding ambulatory medical errors: A report from the ASIPS collaborative. Available at: www.ahrq.gov/downloads/pub/advances/vol2/Pace.pdf. - PubMed
    1. The Linnaeus-PC Collaboration. International taxonomy of medical errors in primary care-Version 2. Washington, DC: The Robert Graham Center; 2004. [Accessed March 9, 2008]. Available at: www.errorsinmedicine.net/taxonomy/aafp/AAFP_taxonomyAugust19.pdf.

LinkOut - more resources