Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review

Patient Monitors in Critical Care: Lessons for Improvement

Frank A. Drews  1
Kerm Henriksen, James B Battles, Margaret A Keyes, Mary L Grady
, editors.
In: Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 3: Performance and Tools). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 Aug.
Advances in Patient Safety.
Affiliations
Free Books & Documents
Review

Patient Monitors in Critical Care: Lessons for Improvement

Frank A. Drews.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

Unexpected incidents are common in intensive care medicine. One means of detecting, diagnosing, and treating these events is use of physiologic displays that show the patients’ vital signs. Monitors currently in use in intensive care units (ICUs) provide information in numerical and waveform formats, but most such displays originated in patient monitors developed for use by anesthesiologists. The present study focused on problems related to patient monitoring and needs of ICU nurses. Semistructured interviews of 26 experienced ICU nurses were employed to identify monitor usability problems. Among their comments, interviewed nurses mentioned that monitors now in use make it difficult to access vital sign trends and do not permit marking of events or interventions on trend displays. The present results indicate that patient monitoring in the ICU could be improved, but that such improvement will require identification of the tasks nurses perform and the development of new monitoring tools that fit their specific needs.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Goodstein LP. Discriminative display support for process operators. In: Rasmussen J, Rouse WB, editors. Human detection and diagnosis of system failure. New York: Plenum; 1981. pp. 433–49.
    1. Vicente KJ, Rasmussen J. The ecology of human-machine systems II: Mediating “direct perception” in complex work domains. Ecol Psycho. 1982;2:207–250.
    1. Drews FA. The frequency and impact of task interruptions in the ICU. Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2007 Oct 1–5; Baltimore MD: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2007.
    1. Agutter J, Drews F, Syroid N, et al. Evaluation of graphic cardiovascular display in a high-fidelity simulator. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:1403–13. - PubMed
    1. Durso F, Rawson G. Comprehension and situation awareness. In: Durso F, Nickerson RS, Dumais ST, et al., editors. Handbook of applied cognition. Wiley & Sons; West Sussex: 2007. pp. 163–194.

LinkOut - more resources