Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review

Implementing a Systems Engineering Intervention for Improving Safety in Outpatient Surgeries

In: Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation (Volume 3: Implementation Issues). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2005 Feb.
Affiliations
Free Books & Documents
Review

Implementing a Systems Engineering Intervention for Improving Safety in Outpatient Surgeries

Pascale Carayon et al.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

This paper describes the systems engineering intervention the researchers implemented in their study of patient safety in outpatient surgery. The intervention process is based on the SEIPS (Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety) model of work-system and patient safety. The paper provides details on the steps in the intervention process (e.g., overall structure, decisionmaking criteria for selection of intervention, participants) and the various data collection tools and methods that were used at each step of the intervention process. The systems engineering intervention process consists of three steps: (1) defining and designing the content and the implementation plan of the intervention, (2) implementing the intervention, and (3) institutionalizing the intervention. Data collection methods used for defining and designing the intervention include an initial employee questionnaire and patient shadowing. An employee questionnaire and a patient survey are the two methods used to evaluate the impact of the systems engineering intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

  • An Employee Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Safety in Outpatient Surgery.
    Carayon P, Alvarado CJ, Hundt AS, Springman S, Borgsdorf A, Hoonakker PLT. Carayon P, et al. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, Lewin DI, editors. Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation (Volume 4: Programs, Tools, and Products). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2005 Feb. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, Lewin DI, editors. Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation (Volume 4: Programs, Tools, and Products). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2005 Feb. PMID: 21250041 Free Books & Documents. Review.
  • EMS Quality Improvement Programs.
    Lincoln EW, Reed-Schrader E, Jarvis JL. Lincoln EW, et al. 2023 Jul 17. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2023 Jul 17. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 30725667 Free Books & Documents.
  • OSHA Bloodborne Pathogen Standards.
    Denault D, Gardner H. Denault D, et al. 2023 Jul 20. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2023 Jul 20. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 34033323 Free Books & Documents.
  • Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model.
    Carayon P, Schoofs Hundt A, Karsh BT, Gurses AP, Alvarado CJ, Smith M, Flatley Brennan P. Carayon P, et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Dec;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i50-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.015842. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006. PMID: 17142610 Free PMC article. Review.
  • No one size fits all-the development of a theory-driven intervention to increase in-hospital mobility: the "WALK-FOR" study.
    Zisberg A, Agmon M, Gur-Yaish N, Rand D, Hayat Y, Gil E; WALK-FOR team. Zisberg A, et al. BMC Geriatr. 2018 Apr 13;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0778-3. BMC Geriatr. 2018. PMID: 29653507 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Carayon P, Alvarado CJ, Brennan P, et al. Work system and patient safety. In: Luczak H, Zink KJ (editors). Human factors in organizational design and management-VII. Santa Monica, CA: IEA Press; 2003. pp. 583–9.
    1. Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988;260(12):1743–8. - PubMed
    1. Smith MJ, Carayon-Sainfort P. A balance theory of job design for stress reduction. Internat J Industr Ergon. 1989;4:67–79.
    1. Carayon P, Smith MJ. Work organization and ergonomics. Appl Ergon. 2000;31:649–62. - PubMed
    1. Wilson JR. A framework and a context for ergonomics methodology. In: Wilson JR, Corlett EN (editors). Evaluation of human work—a practical ergonomics methodology. London, UK: Taylor & Francis; 1995. pp. 1–39.

LinkOut - more resources