Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review

Ethical Issues in Resource Allocation, Research, and New Product Development

In: Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. 2nd edition. Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank; 2006. Chapter 14.
Free Books & Documents
Review

Ethical Issues in Resource Allocation, Research, and New Product Development

Dan W. Brock et al.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

The ethical justification for developing and providing the means to reduce the burden of disease in developing countries is self-evident. Nevertheless, those who pursue these laudable ends encounter ethical dilemmas at every turn. The development of new interventions requires testing with human subjects, an activity fraught with controversy since the dawn of scientific medicine and especially problematic with poor and vulnerable participants in developing countries. Ethical dilemmas arising in setting priorities among interventions and among individuals in need of care are most acute when needs are great and resources few.

We address some of these concerns in this chapter, identifying some of the principal ethical issues that arise in the development and allocation of effective interventions for developing countries and discussing some alternative resolutions. We omit discussion of two other aspects of these ethical decisions: ensuring that the process of decision making is fair and involves the subject population (Daniels 2000; Holm 1998), and respecting legal obligations under international human rights treaties (Gruskin and Tarantola 2001).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. 1995. Final Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
    1. Birdsall, N., and R. Hecht. 1995. "Swimming against the Tide: Strategies for Improving Equity in Health." Human Capital Development and Operations Policy Working Paper 55, World Bank, Washington, DC.
    1. Birstein, V. 2001. The Perversion of Knowledge: The True Story of Soviet Science. Boulder, CO: Westview.
    1. Brandt, A. 2000. "Racism and Research: The Case of the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment." In Tuskegee's Truths: Rethinking the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, ed. S. M. Reverby. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
    1. Brock, D. 1988. "Ethical Issues in Recipient Selection for Organ Transplantation." In Organ Substitution Technology: Ethical, Legal, and Public Policy Issues, ed. D. Mathieu. Boulder, CO, and London: Westview.

LinkOut - more resources