Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review

Water Supply, Sanitation, and Hygiene Promotion

In: Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. 2nd edition. Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank; 2006. Chapter 41.
Free Books & Documents
Review

Water Supply, Sanitation, and Hygiene Promotion

Sandy Cairncross et al.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

This chapter focuses on water supply, excreta disposal, and hygiene promotion and considers the costs and benefits of each in turn. Water supply and sanitation can be provided at various levels of service, and those levels have implications for benefits. Water supply and sanitation offer many benefits in addition to improved health, and those benefits are considered in detail because they have important implications for the share of the cost that is attributable to the health sector. From the point of view of their effect on burden of disease, the main health benefit of water supply, sanitation, and hygiene is a reduction in diarrheal disease, although the effects on other diseases are substantial. In the concluding sections, the percentage reductions arrived at in the discussion throughout the chapter are used together with data on existing levels of coverage to derive estimates of the potential effects of water supply and excreta disposal on the burden of disease, globally and by region, and with cost data to derive cost-effectiveness estimates.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Allan, S. 2003. "The WaterAid Bangladesh/VERC 100% Sanitation Approach; Cost, Motivation and Subsidy." M.Sc. dissertation, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
    1. Altaf M. A. Household Demand for Improved Water and Sanitation in a Large Secondary City: Findings from a Study in Gujranwala, Pakistan. Habitat International. 1994;18(1):45–55.
    1. Arlosoroff S., G. Tchannerl, D. Gray, W. Journey, A. Karp, O. Langenegger, and R. Roche. 1987. Community Water Supply: The Handpump Option. Washington, DC: World Bank.
    1. Bern C., Martines J., de Zoysa I., Glass R. I. The Magnitude of the Global Problem of Diarrheal Disease: A Ten-Year Update. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1992;70(6):705–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blum D., Feachem R. G. Measuring the Impact of Water Supply and Sanitation Investments on Diarrheal Diseases: Problems of Methodology. International Journal of Epidemiology. 1983;12(3):357–65. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources