Illicit Opiate Abuse
- PMID: 21250368
- Bookshelf ID: NBK11797
Illicit Opiate Abuse
Excerpt
Illicit opioid use, especially injecting use, contributes to premature mortality and morbidity in many developed and developing societies. Fatal overdoses and HIV/AIDS resulting from the sharing of dirty injecting equipment are major contributors to mortality and morbidity, and the economic costs of illicit opioid dependence are substantial. Illicit opioid dependence generates substantial externalities that are not included in burden-of-disease estimates, principally law enforcement costs incurred in handling drug dealing and property crime.
The most popular interventions for illicit opioid dependence in many developed societies have been law enforcement efforts to interdict the drug supply and enforce legal sanctions against the use of opioid drugs. One consequence of this strategy has been that most illicit opioid users have been exposed to the least effective intervention: imprisonment for drug or property offenses. Prisons rarely take the opportunity to treat dependence using opioid maintenance or to reduce the harm caused by illicit opioid use by providing access to clean injecting equipment.
In treatment settings, the most popular interventions have been detoxification (which is not a treatment but a prelude to treatment) and drug-free treatment (which is the least attractive and the least effective in retaining opioid-dependent people in treatment). Opioid agonist maintenance treatment has been ambivalently supported in many developed societies despite its being the treatment for which there is the best evidence of effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness. The range of opioid agonists available for maintenance treatment is increasing. A number of developed countries have approved the use of BMT, which the limited data suggest may be approximately equivalent to MMT in efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Opioid antagonists have a niche role in the treatment of opioid dependence because of poor compliance and an increased risk of overdose on return to heroin use. Their efficacy may improve with the development of long-acting injectable forms of the drug.
Copyright © 2006, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank Group.
Sections
- Nature, Causes, and Health Consequences of Illicit Opioid Use
- Contribution of Opioid Dependence to the Global Burden of Disease
- Interventions for Illicit Opioid Dependence
- Relevance to Developing Countries
- Research and Development
- Conclusions: Promises and Pitfalls
- Annex 48.A: Prevalence of Use, Adverse Health Effects of and Interventions for Cannabis, Cocaine, Amphetamines, and MDMA Use and Dependence
- References
References
-
- Ainsworth M., Beyrer C., Soucat A. AIDS and Public Policy: The Lessons and Challenges of `Success' in Thailand. Health Policy. 2003;64(1):13–37. - PubMed
-
- American Psychiatric Association. 1994. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
-
- Anglin, M. D. 1988. "The Efficacy of Civil Commitment in Treating Narcotic Drug Addiction." In Compulsory Treatment of Drug Abuse: Research and Clinical Practice, ed. C. G. Leukefeld and F. M. Tims, 8–34. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
-
- Anglin M. D., Brecht M. L., Maddahain E. Pre-treatment Characteristics and Treatment Performance of Legally Coerced versus Voluntary Methadone Maintenance Admissions. Criminology. 1989;27(3):537–57.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources