Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 21252735
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318203e6a5
Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: To compare efficacy and safety of trocar-guided tension-free vaginal mesh insertion with conventional vaginal prolapse repair in patients with recurrent pelvic organ prolapse.
Methods: Patients with recurrent pelvic organ prolapse stage II or higher were randomly assigned to either conventional vaginal prolapse surgery or polypropylene mesh insertion. Primary outcome was anatomic failure (pelvic organ prolapse stage II or higher) in the treated vaginal compartments. Secondary outcomes were subjective improvement, effects on bother, quality of life, and adverse events. Questionnaires such as the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and Urogenital Distress Inventory were administered at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Anatomic outcomes were assessed by an unblinded surgeon. Power calculation with α=0.05 and β=0.80 indicated that 194 patients were needed.
Results: Ninety-seven women underwent conventional repair and 93 mesh repair. The follow-up rate after 12 months was 186 of 190 patients (98%). Twelve months postsurgery, anatomic failure in the treated compartment was observed in 38 of 84 patients (45.2%) in the conventional group and in eight of 83 patients (9.6%) in the mesh group (P<.001; odds ratio, 7.7; 95% confidence interval, 3.3-18). Patients in either group reported less bulge and overactive bladder symptoms. Subjective improvement was reported by 64 of 80 patients (80%) in the conventional group compared with 63 of 78 patients (81%) in the mesh group. Mesh exposure was detected in 14 of 83 patients (16.9%).
Conclusion: At 12 months, the number of anatomic failures observed after tension-free vaginal mesh insertion was less than after conventional vaginal prolapse repair. Symptom decrease and improvement of quality of life were equal in both groups.
Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00372190.
Level of evidence: I.
Comment in
-
Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun;117(6):1435-1436. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821daf31. Obstet Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 21606756 No abstract available.
-
Words of wisdom. Re: Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse.Eur Urol. 2012 Feb;61(2):426. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.11.025. Eur Urol. 2012. PMID: 22186349 No abstract available.
References
-
- Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR, Ballard LA. Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:1299–3046.
-
- Sivaslioglu AA, Unlubilgin E, Dolen I. A randomized comparison of polypropylene mesh surgery with site-specific surgery in the treatment of cystocoele. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008;19:467–71.
-
- Nguyen JN, Burchette RJ. Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:891–8.
-
- Kahn MA, Stanton SL, Kumar D, Fox SD. Posterior colporrhaphy is superior to the transanal repair for treatment of posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn 1999;18:329–30.
-
- Milani AL, Withagen MI, Schweitzer KJ, Janszen EW, Vierhout ME. Midline fascial plication under continuous digital transrectal control: which factors determine anatomic outcome? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2010;21:623–30.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
