Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr;39(4):302-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.007. Epub 2011 Jan 21.

Association between caries location and restorative material treatment provided

Erinne B Lubisich  1 , Thomas J Hilton, Jack L Ferracane, Hristina I Pashova, Bruce Burton; Northwest PRECEDENT
Affiliations

Association between caries location and restorative material treatment provided

Erinne B Lubisich et al. J Dent. 2011 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: This cross-sectional study by the Northwest PRECEDENT practitioners correlated the location of caries diagnosed in the past 12 months with treatment provided.

Methods: An oral health survey was conducted on up to 20 patients per practice for 101 practises in the Northwest PRECEDENT network. A total of 1943 eligible patients were randomly assessed for the location of and treatment provided for caries lesions diagnosed within the past 12 months. Regression analysis using generalized estimating equations (GEE) was performed to assess association of treatment to tooth location and surface characterization, adjusting for age, practice location (urban/rural), dentist gender, and experience level. The analysis accounts for clustering by practice using robust variance estimates.

Results: Overall, 55.4% of patients exhibited recent caries and 42.8% received treatment for at least one permanent tooth. 18% of treated teeth were treated with amalgam, and 72% were treated with composite. This percentage varied as a function of tooth surface characteristics, patient characteristics, and dentist characteristics. The results suggest that restoration selection does depend on tooth type and which surfaces are being restored. The odds of a molar receiving an amalgam restoration are 2.44 (95% CI=1.81-3.30) times higher as compared to a bicuspid, adjusting for all other covariates. When the restoration includes the occlusal surface of a tooth the odds are 0.42 (95% CI=0.20-0.89) times as great that amalgam will be placed. When the restoration includes the mesial or distal surface of the tooth the odds for amalgam restoration are 2.49 (95% CI=1.25-4.95) times higher compared to when it does not include these surfaces.

Conclusion: Restorative material choice varied based on caries location and practitioner gender.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Survey instrument
Figure 2
Figure 2
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Mjor IA. Selection of Restorative materials in general dental practice in Sweden. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1997;55:53–57. - PubMed
    1. Wilson NHF, Burke FJ, Mjor IA. Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practioners in the United Kingdom. Quintessence International. 1997;28(4):245–248. - PubMed
    1. Mjor IA, Moorhead JE. Selection of Restorative Materials, Reasons for Replacement, and Longevity of Restorations in Florida. Journal of the American College of Dentists. 1998;65(3):27–33. - PubMed
    1. Widstrom E, Forss H. Dental practioners' experiences on the usefulness of restorative materials in Finland 1992–1996. British Dental Journal. 1998;185(10):540–542. - PubMed
    1. Mjor IA, Moorhead JE, Dahl JE. Selection of restorative materials in permanent teeth in general practice. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1999;59(5):257–262. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms