Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2011 May;47(7):990-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.12.015. Epub 2011 Jan 21.

Two or three year disease-free survival (DFS) as a primary end-point in stage III adjuvant colon cancer trials with fluoropyrimidines with or without oxaliplatin or irinotecan: data from 12,676 patients from MOSAIC, X-ACT, PETACC-3, C-06, C-07 and C89803

Collaborators, Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Two or three year disease-free survival (DFS) as a primary end-point in stage III adjuvant colon cancer trials with fluoropyrimidines with or without oxaliplatin or irinotecan: data from 12,676 patients from MOSAIC, X-ACT, PETACC-3, C-06, C-07 and C89803

D Sargent et al. Eur J Cancer. 2011 May.

Abstract

Background: The ACCENT group previously established disease-free survival (DFS) with 2 or 3 years median follow-up to predict 5 year overall survival (5 year OS) in stage II and III colon cancer. ACCENT further proposed (1) a stronger association between DFS and OS in stage III than II, and (2) 6 or 7 years necessary to demonstrate DFS/OS surrogacy in recent trials. The relationship between end-points in trials with oral fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin and irinotecan is unknown.

Methods: Associations between the treatment effect hazard ratios (HRs) on 2 and 3 years DFS, and 5 and 6 years OS were examined in 6 phase III trials not included in prior analyses from 1997 to 2002. Individual data for 12,676 patients were analysed; two trials each tested oxaliplatin, irinotecan and oral treatment versus 5-FU/LV.

Findings: Overall association between 2/3 year DFS and 5/6 year OS HRs was modest to poor (simple R² measures: 0.58-0.76, model-based R²: 0.17-0.49). In stage III patients, the association increased (model-based R² ≥ 0.79). Observed treatment effects on 2 year DFS accurately 5/6 year OS effects overall and in stage III patients.

Interpretation: In recent trials of cytotoxic chemotherapy, 2 or 3 years DFS HRs are highly predictive of 5 and 6 years OS HRs in stage III but not stage II patients. In all patients the DFS/OS association is stronger for 6 year OS, thus at least 6 year follow-up is recommended to assess OS benefit. These data support DFS as the primary end-point for stage III colon cancer trials testing cytotoxic agents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Rate of recurrence and death by time from randomization (online only) Legend: Risk of recurrence in each 6 month interval following randomization among those remaining recurrence free at the start of each interval, by time.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Hazard ratios for 2 and 3yr DFS vs 5 and 6yr OS, stage III patients Figure 2A: 2yr DFS vs 5yr OS Figure 2B: 3yr DFS vs 5yr OS Figure 2C: 2yr DFS vs 6yr OS Figure 2D: 3yr DFS vs 6yr OS
Figure 2
Figure 2
Hazard ratios for 2 and 3yr DFS vs 5 and 6yr OS, stage III patients Figure 2A: 2yr DFS vs 5yr OS Figure 2B: 3yr DFS vs 5yr OS Figure 2C: 2yr DFS vs 6yr OS Figure 2D: 3yr DFS vs 6yr OS
Figure 2
Figure 2
Hazard ratios for 2 and 3yr DFS vs 5 and 6yr OS, stage III patients Figure 2A: 2yr DFS vs 5yr OS Figure 2B: 3yr DFS vs 5yr OS Figure 2C: 2yr DFS vs 6yr OS Figure 2D: 3yr DFS vs 6yr OS
Figure 2
Figure 2
Hazard ratios for 2 and 3yr DFS vs 5 and 6yr OS, stage III patients Figure 2A: 2yr DFS vs 5yr OS Figure 2B: 3yr DFS vs 5yr OS Figure 2C: 2yr DFS vs 6yr OS Figure 2D: 3yr DFS vs 6yr OS
Figure 3
Figure 3
Model-based predictions and actual hazard ratios, 2yr DFS as a predictor for 6yr OS, stage III only

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Moertel CG, Fleming TR, Macdonald JS, et al. Levamisole and fluorouracil for adjuvant therapy of resected colon carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:352–358. - PubMed
    1. Sargent DJ, Sobrero A, Grothey A, O’Connell MJ, Buyse M, Andre T, Zheng Y, Green E, Labianca R, O’Callaghan C, Seitz JF, Francini G, Haller D, Yothers G, Goldberg R, de Gramont A. Evidence for cure by adjuvant therapy in colon cancer: Observations based on individual patient data from 20,898 patients on 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb. 2027(6):872–877. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sargent DJ, Wieand HS, Haller DG, et al. Disease-free survival versus overall survival as a primary end point for adjuvant colon cancer studies: individual patient data from 20,898 patients on 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 1;23(34):8664–70. - PubMed
    1. Sargent DJ, Patiyil S, Yothers G, Haller DG, Gray R, Benedetti J, Buyse M, Labianca R, Seitz JF, O’Callaghan CJ, Francini G, Grothey A, O’Connell M, Catalano PJ, Kerr D, Green E, Wieand HS, Goldberg RM, de Gramont A. End points for colon cancer adjuvant trials: Observations and recommendations based on individual patient data from 20,898 patients enrolled onto 18 randomized trials from the ACCENT Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Oct. 1025(29):4569–4574. - PubMed
    1. Kopetz S, Chang GJ, Overman MJ, Eng C, Sargent DJ, Larson DW, Grothey A, Vauthey J-N, Nagorney DM, McWilliams RR. Improved survival in metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with adoption of hepatic resection and improved chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug. 127(22):3677–3683. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms