Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Jan-Feb;31(1):37-61.
doi: 10.1148/rg.311105084.

Articular cartilage in the knee: current MR imaging techniques and applications in clinical practice and research

Affiliations
Review

Articular cartilage in the knee: current MR imaging techniques and applications in clinical practice and research

Michel D Crema et al. Radiographics. 2011 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the most important imaging modality for the evaluation of traumatic or degenerative cartilaginous lesions in the knee. It is a powerful noninvasive tool for detecting such lesions and monitoring the effects of pharmacologic and surgical therapy. The specific MR imaging techniques used for these purposes can be divided into two broad categories according to their usefulness for morphologic or compositional evaluation. To assess the structure of knee cartilage, standard spin-echo (SE) and gradient-recalled echo (GRE) sequences, fast SE sequences, and three-dimensional SE and GRE sequences are available. These techniques allow the detection of morphologic defects in the articular cartilage of the knee and are commonly used in research for semiquantitative and quantitative assessments of cartilage. To evaluate the collagen network and proteoglycan content in the knee cartilage matrix, compositional assessment techniques such as T2 mapping, delayed gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of cartilage (or dGEMRIC), T1ρ imaging, sodium imaging, and diffusion-weighted imaging are available. These techniques may be used in various combinations and at various magnetic field strengths in clinical and research settings to improve the characterization of changes in cartilage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1a
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1b
Figure 2
Figure 2
Axial short inversion time inversion recovery image obtained in the knee accurately depicts a focal full-thickness chondral defect (arrows) at the trochlear groove.
Figure 3a
Figure 3a
Figure 3b
Figure 3b
Figure 3c
Figure 3c
Figure 4
Figure 4
Axial 2D T2-weighted fast SE image provides excellent depiction of a focal region of deep cartilaginous delamination (arrows), with high contrast between the cartilage surfaces and synovial fluid.
Figure 5a
Figure 5a
Figure 5b
Figure 5b
Figure 6a
Figure 6a
Figure 6b
Figure 6b
Figure 6c
Figure 6c
Figure 7
Figure 7
Coronal 3D SPGR image shows intact high-signal-intensity cartilaginous surfaces in the medial and lateral tibiofemoral compartments. Lipid suppression provides excellent contrast between cartilage and subchondral bone.
Figure 8a
Figure 8a
Figure 8b
Figure 8b
Figure 9
Figure 9
Sagittal 3D DEFT image demonstrates a cartilage fissure (arrow) at the medial tibial plateau. The defect is outlined by the high signal intensity of synovial fluid, an appearance that derives from the driven equilibrium acquisition technique.
Figure 10a
Figure 10a
Figure 10b
Figure 10b
Figure 11a
Figure 11a
Figure 11b
Figure 11b
Figure 12a
Figure 12a
Figure 12b
Figure 12b
Figure 13a
Figure 13a
Figure 13b
Figure 13b
Figure 14
Figure 14
Sagittal 3D bSSFP water image obtained with a fluctuating equilibrium technique at 1.5 T (TR/TE = 6.6/1.8, in-plane resolution = 0.3 × 0.6 mm, section thickness = 2 mm, acquisition time = 2 min 43 sec) provides excellent contrast between cartilage and fluid despite areas of imperfect fat-water separation (arrowheads) resulting from field inhomogeneity.
Figure 15
Figure 15
Sagittal IDEAL-bSSFP water image shows excellent contrast between cartilage and synovial fluid (arrows) and between cartilage and other surrounding tissues.
Figure 16a
Figure 16a
Figure 16b
Figure 16b
Figure 17
Figure 17
Sagittal 3D SPACE water image accurately depicts cartilage thinning at the medial femoral condyle (arrowheads) and tearing at the posterior horn of the medial meniscus (arrow). Note the anterior medial femoral osteophyte.
Figure 18a
Figure 18a
Figure 18b
Figure 18b
Figure 19a
Figure 19a
Figure 19b
Figure 19b
Figure 19c
Figure 19c
Figure 20a
Figure 20a
Figure 20b
Figure 20b
Figure 21a
Figure 21a
Figure 21b
Figure 21b
Figure 22
Figure 22
Whole-knee sodium MR image obtained with a proton density–weighted SPGR sequence in a healthy 20-year-old volunteer shows high signal intensity in cartilage at the medial compartment. Images were acquired at 3.0 T with a custom quadrature sodium coil and 3D cones readout trajectory, with a spatial resolution of 1.25 × 1.25 × 4 mm and acquisition time of 20 min. Scale is in millimoles.
Figure 23
Figure 23
Sagittal ADC map obtained with diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the knee of an asymptomatic 28-year-old man shows a region of higher signal intensity at the posterior aspect of the medial femoral condyle, a finding suggestive of increased water proton mobility through a disruption in the cartilage matrix. Imaging was performed at 3.0 T (TR/TE = 2200/73, b = 600 sec/mm2, section thickness = 5 mm, matrix = 192 × 192).
Figure 24a
Figure 24a
Figure 24b
Figure 24b

Comment in

References

    1. Felson DT. Osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med 2006;354(8):841–848. - PubMed
    1. Gold GE, Chen CA, Koo S, Hargreaves BA, Bangerter NK. Recent advances in MRI of articular cartilage. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193(3):628–638. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gold GE, McCauley TR, Gray ML, Disler DG. What's new in cartilage? RadioGraphics 2003;23(5):1227–1242. - PubMed
    1. Burstein D, Gray M, Mosher T, Dardzinski B. Measures of molecular composition and structure in osteoarthritis. Radiol Clin North Am 2009;47(4):675–686. - PubMed
    1. Trattnig S, Domayer S, Welsch GW, Mosher T, Eckstein F. MR imaging of cartilage and its repair in the knee: a review. Eur Radiol 2009;19(7):1582–1594. - PubMed

MeSH terms