Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Jan;6(1):42-8.
doi: 10.4161/psb.6.1.13978. Epub 2011 Jan 1.

The plant cell nucleus: a true arena for the fight between plants and pathogens

Affiliations
Review

The plant cell nucleus: a true arena for the fight between plants and pathogens

Laurent Deslandes et al. Plant Signal Behav. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

Communication between the cytoplasm and the nucleus is a fundamental feature shared by both plant and animal cells. Cellular factors involved in the transport of macromolecules through the nuclear envelope, including nucleoporins, importins and Ran-GTP related components, are conserved among a variety of eukaryotic systems. Interestingly, mutations in these nuclear components compromise resistance signalling, illustrating the importance of nucleocytoplasmic trafficking in plant innate immunity. Indeed, spatial restriction of defence regulators by the nuclear envelope and stimulus-induced nuclear translocation constitute an important level of defence-associated gene regulation in plants. A significant number of effectors from different microbial pathogens are targeted to the plant cell nucleus. In addition, key host factors, including resistance proteins, immunity components, transcription factors and transcriptional regulators shuttle between the cytoplasm and the nucleus, and their level of nuclear accumulation determines the output of the defence response, further confirming the crucial role played by the nucleus during the interaction between plants and pathogens. Here, we discuss recent findings that situate the nucleus at the frontline of the mutual recognition between plants and invading microbes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the transport of plant immune receptors and regulatory components across the nuclear envelope. (A) The MLA10-mediated immune response is activated by the AVRA10 effector, which promotes nuclear accumulation of CC-NB-LRR resistance protein MLA10. In resting cells, HvWRKY2 acts as a transcriptional repressor of basal defense responses. After pathogen perception, MLA10 binds HvWRKY2 through its CC domain, thereby releasing the negative regulation of the immune response. (B) The PopP2 effector, which triggers the RRS1-R-mediated resistance response, promotes nuclear accumulation of the TIR-NB-LRR-WRKY immune receptor RRS1-R and the vacuolar cysteine protease RD19. In unchallenged cells, RRS1-R is hypothesized to act as a transcriptional repressor of basal defense responses. The RD19/PopP2 protein complex would be recognized by RRS1-R leading to either modification of RRS1-R transcriptional activity or transcriptional activation by additional transcription factors, thereby derepressing defense responses. (C) The tobacco TIR-NB-LRR immune receptor N resides in the cytoplasm and the nucleus of non-infected cells. After pathogen inoculation, the tobacco rhodanase sulfurtransferase NRIP1, which localizes to the stroma of chloroplast in resting cells, is recruited to the cytoplasm of the plant cell by the p50 effector, to form a pre-recognition complex. This NRIP1/p50 complex interacts with the N receptor thanks to NRIP1, which binds to the TIR domain of N, leading to the activation of cytoplasmic N. Once activated, cytoplasmic N either enters the nucleus or sends a signal that activates the N nuclear pool, resulting in the activation of a successful defense response. (D) Basal and TIR-NB-LRR resistance protein-mediated defense responses depend on the regulatory immune complexes formed by the EDS1, PAD4 and SAG101 proteins. EDS1 can exist in a complex with PAD4 in both the cytoplasm and nucleus, and with SAG101 in the nucleus, resulting in the regulation of defense gene transcription. The role of EDS1 homodimers in the cytoplasm is still unknown. Dynamic changes in the binding affinities and concentrations of these complexes modulate nuclear accumulation of defense-related components, which allows the plant to mount an appropriate immune response. (E) The transcriptional regulator NPR1 primarily exists as inactive oligomers in the cytoplasm of non-elicited cells. Pathogen recognition leads to a change in the cell redox potential, resulting in the formation of reduced active NPR1 monomers that are translocated into the nucleus. Within the nucleus, NPR1 associates with TGA transcription factors to promote defense gene expression. Levels of nuclear NPR1 accumulation are controlled by protein degradation through the 26S proteasome. (F) The secreted phospholipase AtsPLA2-α is partially relocalized, via a yet undescribed mechanism, from Golgi vesicles to the nucleus where it interacts with the transcription factor AtMYB30, leading to transcriptional repression of defense responses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Model for nucleocytoplasmic transport of macromolecules through the nuclear pore complex. Cytoplasmic proteins with a nuclear localization signal (NLS) are translocated into the nucleus through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs), which are composed of nucleoporins (Nups) and span the double membrane of the nuclear envelope. The NLS in cargo proteins is recognized and bound by importin receptors (importin α and β) promoting their transport across the NPC, via the importin β-mediated interaction with Nups. The Ras-related nuclear (Ran) protein provides the directionality of transport via its binding to GDP (cytoplasmic side) or GTP (nuclear side). Export receptors (exportins) recognize nuclear export signals (NES) in cargo proteins and promote their nuclear export to the cytoplasm. Mutations in AtNup96 (MOS3), AtNup88 (MOS7) and importin α3 (MOS6) have been shown to impair the nuclear transport of immunity components, resulting in altered defense responses.

References

    1. Ausubel FM. Are innate immune signaling pathways in plants and animals conserved? Nat Immunol. 2005;6:973–979. - PubMed
    1. Zipfel C. Pattern-recognition receptors in plant innate immunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2008;20:10–16. - PubMed
    1. Boller T, Felix G. A renaissance of elicitors: perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009;60:379–406. - PubMed
    1. Jones JD, Dangl JL. The plant immune system. Nature. 2006;444:323–329. - PubMed
    1. Meylan E, Tschopp J, Karin M. Intracellular pattern recognition receptors in the host response. Nature. 2006;442:39–44. - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources