[Comparison of fetal heart rate patterns in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy]
- PMID: 21271146
- DOI: 10.1590/s0100-72032010000900002
[Comparison of fetal heart rate patterns in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy]
Abstract
Purpose: to compare the patterns of fetal heart rate (FHR) in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.
Methods: a prospective and comparative study performed between January 2008 and July 2009. The inclusion criteria were: singleton pregnancy, live fetus, pregnant women without clinical or obstetrical complications, no fetal malformation, gestational age between 24 and 27 weeks (2nd trimester - 2T) or between 36 and 40 weeks (3rd trimester - 3T). Computerized cardiotocography (System 8002 - Sonicaid) was performed for 30 minutes and the fetal biophysical profile was obtained. System 8002 analyzes the FHR tracings for periods of 3.75 seconds (1/16 minutes). During each period, the mean duration of the time intervals between successive fetal heart beats is determined in milliseconds (ms); the mean FHR and also the differences between adjacent periods are calculated for each period. The parameters included: basal FHR, FHR accelerations, duration of high variation episodes, duration of low variation episodes and short-term variation. The dataset was analyzed by the Student t test, chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.
Results: eighteen pregnancies on the second trimester were compared to 25 pregnancies on the third trimester. There was a significant difference in the FHR parameters evaluated by computerized cardiotocography between the 2T and 3T groups, regarding the following results: mean basal FHR (mean, 143.8 bpm versus 134.0 bpm, p=0.009), mean number of transitory FHR accelerations > 10 bpm (3.7 bpm versus 8.4 bpm, p <0.001) and >15 bpm (mean, 0.9 bpm versus 5.4 bpm, p <0.001), mean duration of high variation episodes (8.4 min versus 15.4 min, p=0.008) and mean short - term variation (8.0 ms versus 10.9 ms, p=0.01). The fetal biophysical profile showed normal results in all pregnancies.
Conclusion: the present study shows significant differences in the FHR characteristics when the 2nd and 3rd trimesters of pregnancy are compared and confirms the influence of autonomic nervous system maturation on FHR regulation.
Similar articles
-
Transient accelerations of fetal heart rate analyzed by computerized cardiotocography in the third trimester of pregnancy.Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2014 May-Jun;60(3):270-5. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.60.03.017. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2014. PMID: 25004274
-
[Effects of maternal anemia on computerized cardiotocography and fetal biophysical profile].Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2009 Dec;31(12):615-20. doi: 10.1590/s0100-72032009001200007. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2009. PMID: 20101377 Portuguese.
-
[Computerized cardiotocography analysis of fetal heart response to acoustic stimulation].Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2009 Nov;31(11):547-51. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2009. PMID: 20084325 Portuguese.
-
Improvements in computerized fetal heart rate analysis antepartum.J Perinat Med. 1996;24(1):25-36. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1996.24.1.25. J Perinat Med. 1996. PMID: 8708928 Review.
-
Characteristics of Heart Rate Tracings in Preterm Fetus.Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 May 25;57(6):528. doi: 10.3390/medicina57060528. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021. PMID: 34070249 Free PMC article. Review.