Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb 24;115(7):1662-71.
doi: 10.1021/jp110243v. Epub 2011 Jan 27.

Simulation of the lo-ld phase boundary in DSPC/DOPC/cholesterol ternary mixtures using pairwise interactions

Affiliations

Simulation of the lo-ld phase boundary in DSPC/DOPC/cholesterol ternary mixtures using pairwise interactions

Jian Dai et al. J Phys Chem B. .

Abstract

Recently, a number of ternary phase diagrams of lipid mixtures have been constructed using various experimental techniques with a common goal of understanding the nature of lipid domains. An accurate experimental phase diagram can provide rich thermodynamic information and can also be used to extract molecular interactions using computer simulation. In this study, the liquid-ordered and liquid-disordered (l(o)-l(d)) phase boundary of DSPC/DOPC/Cholesterol ternary mixtures is simulated in a lattice model using pairwise interactions. The block composition distribution (BCD) technique was used to locate accurately the compositions of coexisting phases and thermodynamics tie-lines in the two-phase region, and the Binder ratio method was used to determine the phase boundary in the critical region. In simulations performed along a thermodynamic tie-line, the BCD method correctly samples the compositions as well as the relative amounts of coexisting phases, which is in excellent agreement with the lever rule. A "best-fit" phase boundary was obtained that has a top boundary closely resembling the experimental boundary. However, the width of the simulated two-phase region is significantly wider than the experimental one. The results show that pairwise interactions alone are not sufficient to describe the complexity of molecular interactions in the ternary lipid mixtures; more complex forms of interactions, possibly multibody interaction or domain interfacial energy, should be included in the simulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Three types of particle moves are used in simulations. A phospholipid is treated as physically linked dimer chains occupying two adjacent sites, and a cholesterol molecule occupies one site. DSPC acyl chains: red; DOPC acyl chains: yellow; cholesterol: black. (A) Nearest-neighbor dimer pair rotation; (B) long-range dimer-dimer exchange; and (C) nearest-neighbor cholesterol-dimer flipping.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Snapshots of lateral lipid distributions for some DSPC/DOPC/cholesterol mixtures simulated with pairwise interaction energies (ΔEOS=0.54 kT, ΔEOC=-1.0 kT, ΔESC=-1.3) reveals phase separations and the range of cluster sizes. Black dots, cholesterol; Yellow dots, DOPC acyl chains; Red dots, DSPC acyl chains. Two chains from the same PC were physically linked. All mixtures have the same R ratio (i.e., DSPC/(DSPC+DOPC)) of 0.5, but different cholesterol mole fraction χC. (A) and (B) are 2-phase mixtures, (D) and (E) are 1-phase mixtures, and (C) is a mixture at the phase boundary. (F) is an ideal (random) mixing distribution at χC = 0.48.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Local composition histograms for the five mixtures in Fig. 2 reveals coexisting phases. A local lipid composition is specified by local R ratio and local χC. The vertical axis is the number of the lattice sites having a particular local lipid composition. Some histograms have been shifted in local χC axis to facilitate viewing. χC is the bulk (overall) cholesterol mole fraction of a simulated mixture.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The upper boundary of phase coexistence of lo + ld is shown on the ternary phase diagram of DSPC/DOPC/cholesterol simulated with pairwise interaction energies (ΔEOS=0.54 kT, ΔEOC=-1.0 kT, ΔESC=-1.3). Open circles and open squares are boundary points obtained by the BCD method. Dashed lines are simulated thermodynamic tie-lines. The filled square is the boundary point obtained from Binder ratio method. The thin solid line is the phase boundary determined using the BCD method and the Binder ratio method together. The thick solid line is the experimental phase boundary. Filled triangles represent overall (bulk) lipid compositions at which simulations with the BCD method were performed. Filled triangles labeled as “a” and “b” indicate the overall lipid compositions of the mixtures “a” and “b” in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The Binder ratio as a function of ΔEOS calculated using phase mask size of 91×91, 121×121, and 141×141 at the bulk composition of R=0.5 and χC=0.40. The crossover occurs at ΔEOS≅ 0.54 kT, at which the Binder ratio becomes independent of system size.
Figure 6
Figure 6
(a) Pair-correlation functions for the 2-phase ternary lipid mixture with R = 0.5 and χC = 0.36. (b) Pair-correlation lengths as a function of χC for mixtures with constant R ratio of 0.5. The phase boundary is at χC = 0.40.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Simulated left and right phase boundaries using the BCD method with different sizes of phase-mask. Simulation lattice size was fixed at 300×300.
Figure 8
Figure 8
The BCD method is consistent with the Lever Rule. Upper: Local lipid composition histograms for five ternary lipid mixtures along a thermodynamic tie-line. The lipid compositions of the left and the right end-points of the tie-line are (R = 0.022, χC = 0.174) and (R = 0.973, χC = 0.294), respectively. Triangle inset: Schematic representation of a thermodynamic tie-line (dashed line) and a phase boundary (solid line). Points “a” to “e”, at which the simulations were performed, evenly divide the length of the tie-line. Bottom: The “weight” fractions of the left and right peaks in the local composition. The solid straight lines are the expected weight fractions according to the Lever Rule. X and Y are the distances from a given point on the tie-line to the two end-points.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Heberle FA, Wu J, Goh SL, Petruzielo RS, Feigenson GW. Biophys J. 2010;99:3309. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith AK, Freed JH. J Phys Chem B. 2009;113:3957. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Veatch SL, Gawrisch K, Keller SL. Biophys J. 2006;90:4428. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhao J, Wu J, Heberle FA, Mills TT, Klawitter P, Huang G, Costanza G, Feigenson GW. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1768:2764. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feigenson GW. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1788:47. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types