Individual vulnerability to addiction
- PMID: 21272012
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05894.x
Individual vulnerability to addiction
Abstract
The process of addiction is often studied in the neurosciences as a function of the quantity or type of substance consumed, with the ultimate goal of counteracting these effects by other pharmacological means. However, epidemiology and clinical research have extensively demonstrated that most individuals who use drugs do not develop dependence. Numerous factors may explain an individual's propensity to addiction. This review discusses these paradigms and summarizes research on individual differences that encompass cultural and sociodemographic factors, psychiatric or psychological vulnerability, and biological or genetic propensity to addiction. Although these different factors often interact in the expression of vulnerable phenotypes, it is possible to alter or control specific sources of vulnerability. For these reasons, integrating individual vulnerability to addiction across different research disciplines is likely to provide the greatest advances for intervention and prevention efforts.
© 2011 New York Academy of Sciences.
Similar articles
-
Molecular genetic underpinnings of human substance abuse vulnerability: likely contributions to understanding addiction as a mnemonic process.Neuropharmacology. 2004;47 Suppl 1:140-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2004.07.029. Neuropharmacology. 2004. PMID: 15464133 Review.
-
Integration of generalized vulnerability to drug and alcohol addiction.J Addict Dis. 1997;16(4):7-22. doi: 10.1080/10550889709511140. J Addict Dis. 1997. PMID: 9328806 Review.
-
Understanding genetic risk for substance use and addiction: a guide for non-geneticists.Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Feb;32(1):60-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.11.002. Epub 2011 Nov 12. Clin Psychol Rev. 2012. PMID: 22155620 Review.
-
[Addiction and personality].Encephale. 2000 Jan-Feb;26(1):68-78. Encephale. 2000. PMID: 10875064 Review. French.
-
Drug abuse: vulnerability and transition to addiction.Pharmacopsychiatry. 2009 May;42 Suppl 1:S42-55. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1216355. Epub 2009 May 11. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2009. PMID: 19434555 Review.
Cited by
-
Low- and high-cocaine locomotor responding rats differ in reinstatement of cocaine seeking and striatal mGluR5 protein expression.Neuropharmacology. 2013 Dec;75:347-55. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Aug 22. Neuropharmacology. 2013. PMID: 23973314 Free PMC article.
-
Locomotor sensitization to ethanol impairs NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity in the nucleus accumbens and increases ethanol self-administration.J Neurosci. 2013 Mar 13;33(11):4834-42. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5839-11.2013. J Neurosci. 2013. PMID: 23486954 Free PMC article.
-
Cognitive Function as a Transdiagnostic Treatment Target in Stimulant Use Disorders.J Dual Diagn. 2016;12(1):90-106. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2016.1146383. J Dual Diagn. 2016. PMID: 26828702 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Individual differences and social influences on the neurobehavioral pharmacology of abused drugs.Pharmacol Rev. 2013 Jan 23;65(1):255-90. doi: 10.1124/pr.111.005124. Print 2013 Jan. Pharmacol Rev. 2013. PMID: 23343975 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Controversies about the enhanced vulnerability of the adolescent brain to develop addiction.Front Pharmacol. 2013 Nov 28;4:118. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2013.00118. Front Pharmacol. 2013. PMID: 24348419 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources