Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Jan:1216:99-113.
doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05893.x.

The epigenetic landscape of addiction

Affiliations
Review

The epigenetic landscape of addiction

Ian Maze et al. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

Drug-induced alterations in gene expression throughout the reward circuitry of the brain are likely components of the persistence of the drug-addicted state. Recent studies examining the molecular mechanisms controlling drug-induced transcriptional, behavioral, and synaptic plasticity have indicated a direct role for chromatin remodeling in the regulation and stability of drug-mediated neuronal gene programs, and the subsequent promulgation of addictive behaviors. In this review, we discuss recent advances in our understanding of chromatin phenomena--or epigenetics, by one definition--that contribute to drug addiction, with the hope that such mechanistic insights may aid in the development of novel therapeutics for future treatments of addiction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Post-translational modifications of histones regulate gene expression. Shown in panel (A) is the nucleosome core particle, representing the functional repeating unit of chromatin, composed of 147 bp of DNA wrapped around a core octamer of histone proteins (two copies each of H2A, H2B, H3 and H4). (B) Combinations of acetylation, phosphorylation, methylation, etc. on histone tails (here, H3 is depicted) alter chromatin compaction promoting altered levels of gene expression in cells. Histone modifications that weaken the interaction between histones and DNA (e.g., histone acetylation at K23, K18, K14, and K9, as well as methylation at K79, K36, and K4 or phosphorylation at S28 and S10) correlate with permissive gene expression. Histone deacetylation or histone methylation on H3K27 or H3K9, which strengthen histone:DNA contacts, promote a state of transcriptional repression. Figure 1 (adapted) from Maze I. & Russo, S.J. 2010. Transcriptional mechanisms underlying addiction-related structural plasticity. Molecular Interventions. In Press. with permission.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Chronic cocaine exposure alters genome-wide patterns of histone modifications and transcription factor binding in NAc. (A) Venn diagrams and (B) heat maps depicting genes displaying altered levels of H3 or H4 acetylation and H3 methylation (dimethyl-K9/K27) promoter occupancy 24 hr after chronic cocaine administration. (C) Venn diagrams of genes displaying significant promoter binding of the transcription factor ΔFosB, and/or of H3/H4 acetylation or H3 methylation in NAc, following chronic cocaine administration. Figure 2 (adapted) from with permission.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cocaine-induced disruption of repressive histone modifying enzymes in NAc results in enhanced behavioral plasticity. (A) Intra-NAc delivery of the specific HDACi suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) significantly potentiates conditioned place preference (CPP) for cocaine. (B) Cocaine-naive HDAC5 KO mice do not show a greater preference for cocaine in comparison to their wildtype littermate controls, however, after prior exposure to cocaine, HDAC5 KO mice develop a significant hypersensitization to cocaine reward. Viral-mediated knockdown of (C) the histone methyltransferase G9a or (D) the DNA methyltransferase DNMT3a in NAc, results in significantly enhanced CPP for cocaine. Figure 3 (adapted) from (D),(A & B),(C) with permission.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Chronic cocaine administration increases both transcriptional and structural plasticity in NAc through chromatin dependent mechanisms. (A) Analysis of gene expression after acute or repeated cocaine indicates increased transcriptional activation/inducibility in NAc. Heat maps (*) display genes up-regulated in NAc 1 hour after a cocaine challenge in naïve animals (acute), in animals treated repeatedly with cocaine (chronic + challenge), or in animals after 7 days of withdrawal from chronic cocaine (chronic wd + challenge). Associated heat maps show how genes are affected under the other two conditions. (B) Methylation of H3K9 promotes chromatin condensation and gene repression. Following either saline or acute cocaine exposure, a complex of HMTs, mainly G9a and GLP, along with HDACs (e.g., HDAC5) bind to histones and repress transcription. After chronic cocaine administration, however, repressive HMT and HDAC binding to plasticity related gene promoters is reduced, which, in combination with increased kinase activity and binding of HATs, ΔFosB, pCREB and RNA polymerase lI (Pol II), results in a permissive state of transcription. Such decreased binding of repressive chromatin complexes results in increased structural plasticity on NAc MSNs. (C) Overexpression of G9a in NAc, which opposes the endogenous effects of cocaine, blocks cocaine-induced alterations in transcription and significantly reduces structural plasticity in this brain region. Figure 4 (adapted) from (A & C) and Maze I. & Russo, S.J. 2010. Transcriptional mechanisms underlying addiction-related structural plasticity. Molecular Interventions. In Press. with permission.

Similar articles

  • Epigenetic mechanisms in drug addiction.
    Renthal W, Nestler EJ. Renthal W, et al. Trends Mol Med. 2008 Aug;14(8):341-50. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 16. Trends Mol Med. 2008. PMID: 18635399 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Epigenetics and addiction.
    Hamilton PJ, Nestler EJ. Hamilton PJ, et al. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2019 Dec;59:128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 Jun 27. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2019. PMID: 31255844 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Epigenetic regulation in substance use disorders.
    McQuown SC, Wood MA. McQuown SC, et al. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2010 Apr;12(2):145-53. doi: 10.1007/s11920-010-0099-5. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2010. PMID: 20425300 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Neuroepigenetics and addictive behaviors: Where do we stand?
    De Sa Nogueira D, Merienne K, Befort K. De Sa Nogueira D, et al. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Nov;106:58-72. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.08.018. Epub 2018 Sep 8. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019. PMID: 30205119 Review.
  • Transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms of addiction.
    Robison AJ, Nestler EJ. Robison AJ, et al. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011 Oct 12;12(11):623-37. doi: 10.1038/nrn3111. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011. PMID: 21989194 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Hyman SE, Malenka RC, Nestler EJ. Neural mechanisms of addiction: the role of reward-related learning and memory. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2006;29:565–598. - PubMed
    1. Kalivas PW, Volkow N, Seamans J. Unmanageable motivation in addiction: a pathology in prefrontal-accumbens glutamate transmission. Neuron. 2005;45:647–650. - PubMed
    1. Koob G, Kreek MJ. Stress, dysregulation of drug reward pathways, and the transition to drug dependence. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:1149–1159. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bird A. Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature. 2007;447:396–398. - PubMed
    1. Waddington CH, editor. The Strategy of the Genes; a Discussion of Some Aspects of Theoretical Bilogy. Allen, & Unwin; London: 1957.