Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study
- PMID: 21272849
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.11.029
Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the maximum time for cervical ripening (from 24-12 hours) would influence the efficacy of a transcervical Foley catheter and to compare efficacy to that of a prostaglandin E(2) vaginal insert.
Study design: Three hundred ninety-seven women were assigned randomly to (1) Foley catheter left in place for a maximum of 24 hours, (2) Foley catheter left in place for a maximum of 12 hours, or (3) prostaglandin E(2) controlled-release vaginal insert. Primary outcome was vaginal delivery within 24 hours.
Results: There were no differences in vaginal delivery rates. The proportion of women who achieved vaginal delivery in 24 hours was lower in the 24-hour Foley catheter group than in the other 2 groups (24-hour Foley catheter, 21.0%; 12-hour Foley catheter, 59.8%; vaginal prostaglandin E(2), 48.5%; P < .0001).
Conclusion: Cutting the ripening time with a Foley catheter by one-half increases the proportion of women who deliver vaginally within 24 hours and yields efficacy similar to that of prostaglandin E(2) vaginal insert.
Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
