Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2011 Aug;26(4):402-10.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.11.001. Epub 2011 Jan 26.

Physical examination, central venous pressure, and chest radiography for the prediction of transpulmonary thermodilution-derived hemodynamic parameters in critically ill patients: a prospective trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Physical examination, central venous pressure, and chest radiography for the prediction of transpulmonary thermodilution-derived hemodynamic parameters in critically ill patients: a prospective trial

Bernd Saugel et al. J Crit Care. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: Physical examination, assessment of central venous pressure (CVP) and chest radiography are diagnostic tools for estimation of volume status in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Passive leg raising (PLR) is a test to estimate fluid responsiveness. Transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) is established for measurement of cardiac index (CI), global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI), and extravascular lung water index (EVLWI). This study compares the estimation of volume status using physical examination, CVP, chest radiography, PLR, and TPTD.

Materials and methods: This study was a prospective trial. Seventy-one patients in a medical ICU were studied. Interventions were as follows: physical examination by 2 independent examiners. CVP was measured. TPTD was performed. In 2 patient subgroups PLR and chest radiography was performed. Comparison of clinical and x-ray-based estimation of volume status, CVP, PLR, and TPTD variables was performed.

Results: Estimation of volume status based on physical examination showed a poor interobserver agreement between the examiners. There was no significant correlation between physical examination-based estimation of volume status and CVP or TPTD-derived GEDVI. There was no significant correlation between CVP and GEDVI, EVLWI or CI. PLR did not indicate fluid responsiveness. Radiographically estimated and TPTD-GEDVI/EVLWI values were significantly different.

Conclusions: In ICU patients, assessment of volume status remains difficult. Physical examination, CVP, and portable radiography do not correlate with TPTD assessment of volume status, preload, or pulmonary hydration.

PubMed Disclaimer