Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan 28;17(4):499-505.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i4.499.

EUS-guided drainage is more successful in pancreatic pseudocysts compared with abscesses

Riadh Sadik  1 , Evangelos Kalaitzakis, Anders Thune, Jan Hansen, Claes Jönson
Affiliations

EUS-guided drainage is more successful in pancreatic pseudocysts compared with abscesses

Riadh Sadik et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Aim: To compare the results for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of clear fluid pancreatic pseudocysts with the results for abscess drainage.

Methods: All patients referred for endoscopic drainage of a fluid collection were prospectively included. The outcome was recorded.

Results: Altogether 26 pseudocysts or abscesses were treated in 25 (6 female) patients. One endoscopist performed the procedures. Non-infected pseudocysts were present in 15 patients and 10 patients had infected fluid collections. The cyst size ranged between 28 cm × 13 cm and 5 cm × 5 cm. The EUS drainage was successful in 94% of the pseudocysts and in 80% of the abscesses (P = 0.04). The complication rate in pseudocysts was 6% and in abscesses was 30% (P = 0.02). Recurrence of a pseudocyst occurred in one patient (4%) after 6 mo; the patient was successfully retreated.

Conclusion: EUS-guided drainage of pseudocysts is associated with a higher success rate and a lower complication rate compared with abscess drainage.

Keywords: Abscess; Drainage; Endoscopic ultrasound; Pancreas; Pseudocyst.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pus drained from an infected pseudocyst.
Figure 2
Figure 2
An infected pseudocyst before and after flushing.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pus accumulating in the stomach.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Necrosectomy in a pseudocyst.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Yusuf TE, Baron TH. Endoscopic transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: results of a national and an international survey of ASGE members. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:223–227. - PubMed
    1. Mönkemüller KE, Baron TH, Morgan DE. Transmural drainage of pancreatic fluid collections without electrocautery using the Seldinger technique. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48:195–200. - PubMed
    1. Kalaitzakis E, Panos M, Sadik R, Aabakken L, Koumi A, Meenan J. Clinicians’ attitudes towards endoscopic ultrasound: a survey of four European countries. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:100–107. - PubMed
    1. Seewald S, Ang TL, Teng KC, Soehendra N. EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts, abscesses and infected necrosis. Dig Endosc. 2009;21 Suppl 1:S61–S65. - PubMed
    1. Vilmann P, Hancke S, Pless T, Schell-Hincke JD, Henriksen FW. One-step endosonography-guided drainage of a pancreatic pseudocyst: a new technique of stent delivery through the echo endoscope. Endoscopy. 1998;30:730–733. - PubMed

Publication types