Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb;61(583):117-23.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X556236.

Questionnaire severity measures for depression: a threat to the doctor-patient relationship?

Geraldine M Leydon  1 , Christopher F Dowrick, Anita S McBride, Hana J Burgess, Amanda C Howe, Pamela D Clarke, Susan P Maisey, Tony Kendrick; QOF Depression Study Team
Affiliations

Questionnaire severity measures for depression: a threat to the doctor-patient relationship?

Geraldine M Leydon et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Since 2006 the Quality Outcomes Framework (QOF) has rewarded GPs for carrying out standardised assessments of the severity of symptoms of depression in newly diagnosed patients.

Aim: To gain understanding of GPs' opinions and perceived impact on practice of the routine introduction of standardised questionnaire measures of severity of depression through the UK general practice contract QOF.

Design of study: Semi-structured qualitative interview study, with purposive sampling and constant comparative analysis.

Setting: Thirty-four GPs from among 38 study general practices in three sites in England, UK: Southampton, Liverpool, and Norfolk.

Method: GPs were interviewed at a time convenient to them by trained interviewers. Interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim in preparation for thematic analysis, to identify key views.

Results: Analysis of the interviews suggested that the use of severity questionnaires posed an intrusion into the consultation. GPs discursively polarised two technologies: formal assessment versus personal enquiry, emphasising the need to ensure the scores are used sensitively and as an aid to clinical judgement rather than as a substitute. Importantly, these challenges implicitly served a function of preserving GPs' identities as professionals with expertise, constructed as integral to the process of diagnosis.

Conclusion: GP accounts indicated concern about threats to patient care. Contention between using severity questionnaires and delivering individualised patient care is significantly motivated by GP concerns to preserve professional expertise and identity. It is important to learn from GP concerns to help establish how best to optimise the use of severity questionnaires in depression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Balancing care in the consultation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • Questionnaire severity measures for depression.
    Gillies J, Mercer S, Watt GC, Scott M, Lyon A. Gillies J, et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2011 May;61(586):324-5. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X572337. Br J Gen Pract. 2011. PMID: 21619758 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health. Depression. management of depression in primary and secondary care. Clinical Guideline 23. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2004.
    1. BMA and NHS Employers. Revisions to the GMS contract, 2006/07. Delivering investment in general practice. London: BMA and NHS Employers; 2006.
    1. Mangin D, Toop L. The Quality and Outcomes Framework: what have you done to yourselves? Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(539):435–437. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campbell SM, McDonald R, Lester H. The experience of pay for performance in english family practice: a qualitative study. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6(3):228–234. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jeffries D. Ever been HAD? Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56(532):885–886. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types