Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Jan 28;13(1):e15.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.1432.

Review of extracting information from the Social Web for health personalization

Affiliations
Review

Review of extracting information from the Social Web for health personalization

Luis Fernandez-Luque et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

In recent years the Web has come into its own as a social platform where health consumers are actively creating and consuming Web content. Moreover, as the Web matures, consumers are gaining access to personalized applications adapted to their health needs and interests. The creation of personalized Web applications relies on extracted information about the users and the content to personalize. The Social Web itself provides many sources of information that can be used to extract information for personalization apart from traditional Web forms and questionnaires. This paper provides a review of different approaches for extracting information from the Social Web for health personalization. We reviewed research literature across different fields addressing the disclosure of health information in the Social Web, techniques to extract that information, and examples of personalized health applications. In addition, the paper includes a discussion of technical and socioethical challenges related to the extraction of information for health personalization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The process of tailoring health education

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eysenbach G. Medicine 2.0: social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(3):e22. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1030. http://www.jmir.org/2008/3/e22/v10i3e22 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kummervold PE, Chronaki CE, Lausen B, Prokosch HU, Rasmussen J, Santana S, Staniszewski A, Wangberg SC. eHealth trends in Europe 2005-2007: a population-based survey. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(4):e42. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1023. http://www.jmir.org/2008/4/e42/v10i4e42 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fox S. Online Health Search 2006. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2006. Oct 29, [2010-04-12]. 5owi8t9ky http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2006/Online-Health-Search-2006.aspx?r=1.
    1. Fox S, Jones S. The social life of health information. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2009. Jun 11, [2009-12-17]. 5m5IixBMx http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2009/PIP_Health_2009.pdf.
    1. Frost JH, Massagli MP. Social uses of personal health information within PatientsLikeMe, an online patient community: what can happen when patients have access to one another's data. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(3):e15. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1053. http://www.jmir.org/2008/3/e15/v10i3e15 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources