Multilaboratory testing of two-drug combinations of antifungals against Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, and Candida parapsilosis
- PMID: 21282457
- PMCID: PMC3067183
- DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01510-09
Multilaboratory testing of two-drug combinations of antifungals against Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, and Candida parapsilosis
Abstract
There are few multilaboratory studies of antifungal combination testing to suggest a format for use in clinical laboratories. In the present study, eight laboratories tested quality control (QC) strain Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and clinical isolates Candida albicans 20533.043, C. albicans 20464.007, Candida glabrata 20205.075, and C. parapsilosis 20580.070. The clinical isolates had relatively high azole and echinocandin MICs. A modified CLSI M27-A3 protocol was used, with 96-well custom-made plates containing checkerboard pairwise combinations of amphotericin B (AMB), anidulafungin (AND), caspofungin (CSP), micafungin (MCF), posaconazole (PSC), and voriconazole (VRC). The endpoints were scored visually and on a spectrophotometer or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) reader for 50% growth reduction (50% inhibitory concentration [IC(50)]). Combination IC(50)s were used to calculate summation fractional inhibitory concentration indices (FICIs) (ΣFIC) based on the Lowe additivity formula. The results revealed that the IC(50)s of all drug combinations were lower or equal to the IC(50) of individual drugs in the combination. A majority of the ΣFIC values were indifferent (ΣFIC = 0.51 to 2.0), but no antagonism was observed (ΣFIC ≥ 4). Synergistic combinations (ΣFIC ≤ 0.5) were found for AMB-PSC against C. glabrata and for AMB-AND and AMB-CSP against C. parapsilosis by both visual and spectrophotometric readings. Additional synergistic interactions were revealed by either of the two endpoints for AMB-AND, AMB-CSP, AMB-MCF, AMB-PSC, AMB-VRC, AND-PSC, CSP-MCF, and CSP-PSC. The percent agreements among participating laboratories ranged from 37.5% (lowest) for AND-CSP and POS-VOR to 87.5% (highest) for AMB-MCF and AND-CSP. Median ΣFIC values showed a wide dispersion, and interlaboratory agreements were less than 85% in most instances. Additional studies are needed to improve the interlaboratory reproducibility of antifungal combination testing.
Similar articles
-
Multilaboratory testing of antifungal combinations against a quality control isolate of Candida krusei.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Apr;52(4):1500-2. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00574-07. Epub 2008 Jan 28. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008. PMID: 18227180 Free PMC article.
-
Candida and candidaemia. Susceptibility and epidemiology.Dan Med J. 2013 Nov;60(11):B4698. Dan Med J. 2013. PMID: 24192246 Review.
-
Activity of Combined Antifungal Agents Against Multidrug-Resistant Candida glabrata Strains.Mycopathologia. 2017 Oct;182(9-10):819-828. doi: 10.1007/s11046-017-0141-9. Epub 2017 May 10. Mycopathologia. 2017. PMID: 28493006
-
The activity of echinocandins, amphotericin B and voriconazole against fluconazole-susceptible and fluconazole-resistant Brazilian Candida glabrata isolates.Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2012 May;107(3):433-6. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762012000300022. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2012. PMID: 22510843
-
Echinocandin antifungal drugs in fungal infections: a comparison.Drugs. 2011 Jan 1;71(1):11-41. doi: 10.2165/11585270-000000000-00000. Drugs. 2011. PMID: 21175238 Review.
Cited by
-
Synergistic combinations of antifungals and anti-virulence agents to fight against Candida albicans.Virulence. 2015;6(4):362-71. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2015.1039885. Virulence. 2015. PMID: 26048362 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Isavuconazole and Liposomal Amphotericin B as Successful Combination Therapy of Refractory Invasive Candidiasis in a Liver Transplant Recipient: A Case Report and Literature Review.Mycopathologia. 2022 Feb;187(1):113-120. doi: 10.1007/s11046-021-00599-1. Epub 2021 Oct 31. Mycopathologia. 2022. PMID: 34718931 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A computer vision chemometric-assisted approach to access pH and glucose influence on susceptibility of Candida pathogenic strains.Arch Microbiol. 2022 Jul 28;204(8):530. doi: 10.1007/s00203-022-03145-9. Arch Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 35900475
-
Role of Antifungal Combinations in Difficult to Treat Candida Infections.J Fungi (Basel). 2021 Sep 6;7(9):731. doi: 10.3390/jof7090731. J Fungi (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34575770 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessing the physiological properties of baker's yeast based on single-cell Raman spectrum technology.Synth Syst Biotechnol. 2024 Sep 11;10(1):110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2024.09.004. eCollection 2025. Synth Syst Biotechnol. 2024. PMID: 39493334 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Almyroudis, N. G., and B. H. Segal. 2009. Prevention and treatment of invasive fungal diseases in neutropenic patients. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 22:385-393. - PubMed
-
- Andes, D. 2003. Clinical pharmacodynamics of antifungals. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 17:635-649. - PubMed
-
- Anonymous. 1992. Synergism testing: broth microdilution checkerboard and broth macrodilution methods, p. 5.18.1-5.18.28. In H. D. Isenberg (ed.), Clinical microbiology procedures handbook. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
-
- Antachopoulos, C., et al. 2005. Fungemia due to Trichosporon asahii in a neutropenic child refractory to amphotericin B: clearance with voriconazole. J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 27:283-285. - PubMed
-
- Antachopoulos, C., and T. J. Walsh. 2005. New agents for invasive mycoses in children. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 17:78-87. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources