Using the Delphi technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials: recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies
- PMID: 21283604
- PMCID: PMC3026691
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000393
Using the Delphi technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials: recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies
Abstract
Ian Sinha and colleagues advise that when using the Delphi process to develop core outcome sets for clinical trials, patients and clinicians be involved, researchers and facilitators avoid imposing their views on participants, and attrition of participants be minimized.
Conflict of interest statement
RLS is a member of the PLoS Board of Directors.
References
-
- Sinha IP, Williamson PR, Smyth RL. Outcomes in clinical trials of inhaled corticosteroids for children with asthma are narrowly focussed on short term disease activity. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e6276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006276. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Gandhi GY, Murad MH, Fujiyoshi A, Mullan RJ, Flynn DN, et al. Patient-important outcomes in registered diabetes trials. JAMA. 2008;299:2543–2549. - PubMed
-
- Guyatt GH, Meade MO. Outcome measures: methodologic principles. Sepsis. 1997;1:21–25.
-
- Clarke M. Standardising outcomes in paediatric clinical trials. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050102. - DOI
-
- Williamson PR, Gamble C, Altman DG, Hutton JL. Outcome selection bias in meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res. 2005;14:515–524. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
