Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan 24;6(1):e16557.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016557.

The cost of sex: quantifying energetic investment in gamete production by males and females

Affiliations

The cost of sex: quantifying energetic investment in gamete production by males and females

April Hayward et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The relative energetic investment in reproduction between the sexes forms the basis of sexual selection and life history theories in evolutionary biology. It is often assumed that males invest considerably less in gametes than females, but quantifying the energetic cost of gamete production in both sexes has remained a difficult challenge. For a broad diversity of species (invertebrates, reptiles, amphibians, fishes, birds, and mammals), we compared the cost of gamete production between the sexes in terms of the investment in gonad tissue and the rate of gamete biomass production. Investment in gonad biomass was nearly proportional to body mass in both sexes, but gamete biomass production rate was approximately two to four orders of magnitude higher in females. In both males and females, gamete biomass production rate increased with organism mass as a power law, much like individual metabolic rate. This suggests that whole-organism energetics may act as a primary constraint on gamete production among species. Residual variation in sperm production rate was positively correlated with relative testes size. Together, these results suggest that understanding the heterogeneity in rates of gamete production among species requires joint consideration of the effects of gonad mass and metabolism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Relationships between gonad and soma mass.
The logarithm of gonad mass (g) versus the logarithm of soma mass (g) for males (diamonds) and females (circles).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Relationships between gamete biomass production rates, body size, and gonad mass.
(A) The logarithm of temperature-corrected daily sperm biomass production rates (W; diamonds, dashed black line) and the logarithm of daily egg biomass production rate (W; circles, solid line) versus the logarithm of body mass (g). The relationship between metabolism and body mass for ectotherms at 20°C is plotted for comparative purposes (dashed orange line). (B) Residual daily gamete biomass production rates (from a log-log plot of daily gamete biomass production rates versus body mass) versus residual gonad mass (from a log-log plot of gonad mass versus body mass) males (diamonds, dashed line) and females (circles).

References

    1. Kokko H, Jennions M. It takes two to tango. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2003;18:103–104.
    1. Trivers R. Campbell B, editor. Parental investment and sexual selection. 1972. pp. 139–179. Sexual Selection and the Descent o fMan 1871-1971: Aldine Press.
    1. Parker GA. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biological Reviews. 1970;45:525–567.
    1. Parker GA. Why are there so many tiny sperm? Sperm competition and the maintenance of two sexes. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 1982;96:281–294. - PubMed
    1. Bateman AJ. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity. 1948;2:349–368. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources