Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan 24;6(1):e16236.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016236.

Diagnostic accuracy of real-time PCR assays targeting 16S rRNA and lipL32 genes for human leptospirosis in Thailand: a case-control study

Janjira Thaipadungpanit  1 , Wirongrong Chierakul, Vanaporn Wuthiekanun, Direk Limmathurotsakul, Premjit Amornchai, Siriphan Boonslip, Lee D Smythe, Roongrueng Limpaiboon, Alex R Hoffmaster, Nicholas P J Day, Sharon J Peacock
Affiliations

Diagnostic accuracy of real-time PCR assays targeting 16S rRNA and lipL32 genes for human leptospirosis in Thailand: a case-control study

Janjira Thaipadungpanit et al. PLoS One. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Rapid PCR-based tests for the diagnosis of leptospirosis can provide information that contributes towards early patient management, but these have not been adopted in Thailand. Here, we compare the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of two real-time PCR assays targeting rrs or lipL32 for the diagnosis of leptospirosis in northeast Thailand.

Methods/principal findings: A case-control study of 266 patients (133 cases of leptospirosis and 133 controls) was constructed to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity (DSe & DSp) of both PCR assays. The median duration of illness prior to admission of cases was 4 days (IQR 2-5 days; range 1-12 days). DSe and DSp were determined using positive culture and/or microscopic agglutination test (MAT) as the gold standard. The DSe was higher for the rrs assay than the lipL32 assay (56%, (95% CI 47-64%) versus 43%, (95% CI 34-52%), p<0.001). No cases were positive for the lipL32 assay alone. There was borderline evidence to suggest that the DSp of the rrs assay was lower than the lipL32 assay (90% (95% CI 83-94%) versus 93%, (95%CI 88-97%), p = 0.06). Nine controls gave positive reactions for both assays and 5 controls gave a positive reaction for the rrs assay alone. The DSe of the rrs and lipL32 assays were high in the subgroup of 39 patients who were culture positive for Leptospira spp. (95% and 87%, respectively, p = 0.25).

Conclusions/significance: Early detection of Leptospira using PCR is possible for more than half of patients presenting with leptospirosis and could contribute to individual patient care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study design and patient recruitment.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ko AI, Goarant C, Picardeau M. Leptospira: the dawn of the molecular genetics era for an emerging zoonotic pathogen. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7:736–747. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bharti AR, Nally JE, Ricaldi JN, Matthias MA, Diaz MM, et al. Leptospirosis: a zoonotic disease of global importance. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003;3:757–771. - PubMed
    1. Levett PN. Leptospirosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001;14:296–326. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wuthiekanun V, Sirisukkarn N, Daengsupa P, Sakaraserane P, Sangkakam A, et al. Clinical diagnosis and geographic distribution of leptospirosis, Thailand. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:124–126. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wuthiekanun V, Chierakul W, Limmathurotsakul D, Smythe LD, Symonds ML, et al. Optimization of culture of Leptospira from humans with leptospirosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:1363–1365. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms