Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan 20;6(1):e16395.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016395.

Facilitators and barriers to adopting robotic-assisted surgery: contextualizing the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology

Affiliations

Facilitators and barriers to adopting robotic-assisted surgery: contextualizing the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology

Christine Benmessaoud et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Robotic-assisted surgical techniques are not yet well established among surgeon practice groups beyond a few surgical subspecialties. To help identify the facilitators and barriers to their adoption, this belief-elicitation study contextualized and supplemented constructs of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in robotic-assisted surgery. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with 21 surgeons comprising two groups: users and nonusers. The main facilitators to adoption were Perceived Usefulness and Facilitating Conditions among both users and nonusers, followed by Attitude Toward Using Technology among users and Extrinsic Motivation among nonusers. The three main barriers to adoption for both users and nonusers were Perceived Ease of Use and Complexity, Perceived Usefulness, and Perceived Behavioral Control. This study's findings can assist surgeons, hospital and medical school administrators, and other policy makers on the proper adoption of robotic-assisted surgery and can guide future research on the development of theories and framing of hypotheses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Modified Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model contextualized for robotic surgery.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Number of comments (pro-robotic surgery versus contra-robotic surgery) per modified UTAUT subconstruct for users and nonusers.
Note: PU – Perceived Usefulness, EM – Extrinsic Motivation, POE – Personal Outcome Expectations, PEUC – Perceived Ease of Use/Complexity, SN – Subjective Norm, SF – Social Factor, I – Image, PBC – Perceived Behavioral Control, FC – Facilitating Conditions, ATU – Attitude Toward Using Technology, L – Leadership.

References

    1. Bergeron B. Achieving clinician buy-in to technology. Medscape General Medicine 4(4). 2002. Available: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/446224. Accessed 2010 Sept 15.
    1. Talamini MA, Hanly EJ. Technology in the operating suite. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2005;293:863–866. - PubMed
    1. Morris B. Robotic surgery: Applications, limitations, and impact on surgical education. Medscape General Medicine. 2005;7(3):72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holden RJ, Karsh TB. Atheoretical model of health information technology usage behaviour with implications for patient safety. Behaviour & Information Technology. 2009;28:1–17.
    1. Haggag AA. Robotic surgery: When technology meets surgical precision. Internet Journal of Health. 2006;5(1):3.

Publication types

MeSH terms