Improving the quality of drug research or simply increasing its cost? An evidence-based study of the cost for data monitoring in clinical trials
- PMID: 21284707
- PMCID: PMC3045557
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03839.x
Improving the quality of drug research or simply increasing its cost? An evidence-based study of the cost for data monitoring in clinical trials
Abstract
Aim: Procedures for verification of data from clinical studies are intended to maintain reliability for clinical trial results. Guidelines or legislations relating to clinical data management are of limited value and no study has yet demonstrated its effectiveness.
Method: Sponsor queries and dual entry procedures from one CRO on three different phase I trials are analysed on content, impact and cost.
Result: In this study, sponsor queries and dual entry procedures proved time and cost inefficient in detecting data discrepancies.
Conclusion: We advocate a more evidence-based approach for enhancing data integrity throughout the process of clinical data management.
© 2011 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology © 2011 The British Pharmacological Society.
Figures
References
-
- Shuchman M. Commercializing clinical trials – risks and benefits of the CRO boom. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1365–8. - PubMed
-
- Hughes B. 2007 FDA drug approvals: a year of flux. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7:107–9. - PubMed
-
- Califf RM. Clinical trials bureaucracy: unintended consequences of well-intentioned policy. Clin Trials. 2006;3:496–502. - PubMed
-
- Rondel RK, Varley SA, Webb CF. Clinical Data Management. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 2000.
-
- ICH Topic E 6 (R1) Guideline for Good Clinical Practice: CPMP/ICH/135/95. European Medicines Agency July 2002. Available at http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guidelin... (last accessed 19 November 2010)
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
