Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb 1:7:2.
doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-7-2.

Accurate inference of shoot biomass from high-throughput images of cereal plants

Affiliations

Accurate inference of shoot biomass from high-throughput images of cereal plants

Mahmood R Golzarian et al. Plant Methods. .

Abstract

With the establishment of advanced technology facilities for high throughput plant phenotyping, the problem of estimating plant biomass of individual plants from their two dimensional images is becoming increasingly important. The approach predominantly cited in literature is to estimate the biomass of a plant as a linear function of the projected shoot area of plants in the images. However, the estimation error from this model, which is solely a function of projected shoot area, is large, prohibiting accurate estimation of the biomass of plants, particularly for the salt-stressed plants. In this paper, we propose a method based on plant specific weight for improving the accuracy of the linear model and reducing the estimation bias (the difference between actual shoot dry weight and the value of the shoot dry weight estimated with a predictive model). For the proposed method in this study, we modeled the plant shoot dry weight as a function of plant area and plant age. The data used for developing our model and comparing the results with the linear model were collected from a completely randomized block design experiment. A total of 320 plants from two bread wheat varieties were grown in a supported hydroponics system in a greenhouse. The plants were exposed to two levels of hydroponic salt treatments (NaCl at 0 and 100 mM) for 6 weeks. Five harvests were carried out. Each time 64 randomly selected plants were imaged and then harvested to measure the shoot fresh weight and shoot dry weight. The results of statistical analysis showed that with our proposed method, most of the observed variance can be explained, and moreover only a small difference between actual and estimated shoot dry weight was obtained. The low estimation bias indicates that our proposed method can be used to estimate biomass of individual plants regardless of what variety the plant is and what salt treatment has been applied. We validated this model on an independent set of barley data. The technique presented in this paper may extend to other plants and types of stresses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Process flow of image processing steps used in the extraction of plant's projected shoot area from the images.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scatter plot of the linear method for two wheat varieties. The blue and green lines are the lines of best fit for two cultivar categories.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A scatter plot of actual SDW compared with the estimated values obtained using the linear model for two salt treatment categories. The blue and green lines are the lines of best fit for two salt treatment categories.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A scatter plot of actual SDW compared with the estimated values obtained using the linear model for five plant age categories.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Scatter plot of Plant Specific Weight in terms of time after planting (plant age). A straight line, the line of best fit, seems to describe a plant's PSW in terms of its age.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Scatter plots of actual SDW compared with the estimated values obtained using the model proposed in this study for two wheat varieties.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Scatter plots of actual SDW compared with the estimated values obtained using the model proposed in this study for two salt treatment categories.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Scatter plots of actual barley shoot dry weight values compared with the estimated shoot dry weight values obtained from Model A (left) and the Model B (right) under two salt treatment categories.

References

    1. Tackenberg O. A new method for non-destructive measurement of biomass, growth rates, vertical biomass distribution and dry matter content based on digital image analysis. Annals of Botany. 2007;99:777–783. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Niklas KJ, Enquist BJ. On the Vegetative Biomass Partitioning of Seed Plant Leaves, Stems, and Roots. The American Naturalist. 2002;159:482–497. doi: 10.1086/339459. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Poorter H, Nagel O. The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review. Functional Plant Biology. 2000;27:595–607. doi: 10.1071/PP99173. - DOI
    1. Wilson PJ, Thompson K, Hodgson JG. Specific Leaf Area and Leaf Dry Matter Content as Alternative Predictors of Plant Strategies. New Phytologist. 1999;143:155–162. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00427.x. - DOI
    1. Wheeler WRCCJ. Estimating plant biomass: A review of techniques. Austral Ecology. 1992;17:121–131. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.1992.tb00790.x. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources