Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb 1:12:32.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-32.

Alumina-on-alumina total hip replacement for femoral neck fracture in healthy patients

Affiliations

Alumina-on-alumina total hip replacement for femoral neck fracture in healthy patients

Giuseppe Solarino et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Total hip replacement is considered the best option for treatment of displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck (FFN). The size of the femoral head is an important factor that influences the outcome of a total hip arthroplasty (THA): implants with a 28 mm femoral head are more prone to dislocate than implants with a 32 mm head. Obviously, a large head coupled to a polyethylene inlay can lead to more wear, osteolysis and failure of the implant. Ceramic induces less friction and minimal wear even with larger heads.

Methods: A total of 35 THAs were performed for displaced intracapsular FFN, using a 32 mm alumina-alumina coupling.

Results: At a mean follow-up of 80 months, 33 have been clinically and radiologically reviewed. None of the implants needed revision for any reason, none of the cups were considered to have failed, no dislocations nor breakage of the ceramic components were recorded. One anatomic cementless stem was radiologically loose.

Conclusions: On the basis of our experience, we suggest that ceramic-on-ceramic coupling offers minimal friction and wear even with large heads.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
hybrid THA preoperatively (A), postoperatively (B) and at 9 (C) years of follow-up.
Figure 2
Figure 2
cementless THA preoperatively (A-B), at 1 (C) and 4 (D) years postoperatively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Garden RS. Stability and union in subcapital fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1964;46:630–47. - PubMed
    1. Rogmark C, Johnell O. Orthopaedic treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(18-19):1143–9. doi: 10.1080/09638280500055933. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Geesink R. Prevention and treatment of recurrent dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Eur Instr Course Lect. 2005;7:127–42.
    1. Bystrom S, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Havelin LI. Norwegian Arthroplasty Register Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxation: a study of 42,987 primary hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74(5):514–24. doi: 10.1080/00016470310017893. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hardinge K. The direct lateral approach. J Bone Joint Surg. 1982;64B:17–19. - PubMed