Evaluation of the safety of C-spine clearance by paramedics: design and methodology
- PMID: 21284880
- PMCID: PMC3040719
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-227X-11-1
Evaluation of the safety of C-spine clearance by paramedics: design and methodology
Abstract
Background: Canadian Emergency Medical Services annually transport 1.3 million patients with potential neck injuries to local emergency departments. Less than 1% of those patients have a c-spine fracture and even less (0.5%) have a spinal cord injury. Most injuries occur before the arrival of paramedics, not during transport to the hospital, yet most patients are transported in ambulances immobilized. They stay fully immobilized until a bed is available, or until physician assessment and/or X-rays are complete. The prolonged immobilization is often unnecessary and adds to the burden of already overtaxed emergency medical services systems and crowded emergency departments.
Methods/design: The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and potential impact of an active strategy that allows paramedics to assess very low-risk trauma patients using a validated clinical decision rule, the Canadian C-Spine Rule, in order to determine the need for immobilization during transport to the emergency department.This cohort study will be conducted in Ottawa, Canada with one emergency medical service. Paramedics with this service participated in an earlier validation study of the Canadian C-Spine Rule. Three thousand consecutive, alert, stable adult trauma patients with a potential c-spine injury will be enrolled in the study and evaluated using the Canadian C-Spine Rule to determine the need for immobilization. The outcomes that will be assessed include measures of safety (numbers of missed fractures and serious adverse outcomes), measures of clinical impact (proportion of patients transported without immobilization, key time intervals) and performance of the Rule.
Discussion: Approximately 40% of all very low-risk trauma patients could be transported safely, without c-spine immobilization, if paramedics were empowered to make clinical decisions using the Canadian C-Spine Rule. This safety study is an essential step before allowing all paramedics across Canada to selectively immobilize trauma victims before transport. Once safety and potential impact are established, we intend to implement a multi-centre study to study actual impact.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01188447.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Pragmatic Strategy Empowering Paramedics to Assess Low-Risk Trauma Patients With the Canadian C-Spine Rule and Selectively Transport Them Without Immobilization: Protocol for a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial.JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jun 1;9(6):e16966. doi: 10.2196/16966. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020. PMID: 32348267 Free PMC article.
-
The out-of-hospital validation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule by paramedics.Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;54(5):663-671.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Apr 24. Ann Emerg Med. 2009. PMID: 19394111
-
Implementation of the Modified Canadian C-Spine Rule by Paramedics.Ann Emerg Med. 2023 Feb;81(2):187-196. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.08.441. Epub 2022 Oct 31. Ann Emerg Med. 2023. PMID: 36328852
-
Validity and reliability of clinical prediction rules used to screen for cervical spine injury in alert low-risk patients with blunt trauma to the neck: part 2. A systematic review from the Cervical Assessment and Diagnosis Research Evaluation (CADRE) Collaboration.Eur Spine J. 2018 Jun;27(6):1219-1233. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5301-6. Epub 2017 Sep 22. Eur Spine J. 2018. PMID: 28940048
-
The Use of Clinical Cervical Spine Clearance in Trauma Patients: A Literature Review.J Emerg Nurs. 2018 Jul;44(4):368-374. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2017.10.013. Epub 2017 Dec 6. J Emerg Nurs. 2018. PMID: 29203049 Review.
Cited by
-
The epidemiology of pre-hospital potential spinal cord injuries in Victoria, Australia: a six year retrospective cohort study.Inj Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;3(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40621-016-0089-0. Epub 2016 Oct 17. Inj Epidemiol. 2016. PMID: 27747560 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a new Emergency Medicine Spinal Immobilization Protocol for trauma patients and a test of applicability by German emergency care providers.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 May 14;24:71. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0267-7. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016. PMID: 27180045 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patient and paramedic engagement in prehospital emergency medicine research.CMAJ. 2018 Nov 7;190(Suppl):S48-S49. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.180352. CMAJ. 2018. PMID: 30404855 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Public Awareness Levels Regarding Cervical Spine Injury and the Suitable First Aid Response Among Adults in Makkah, Saudi Arabia.Int J Gen Med. 2024 Dec 17;17:6253-6267. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S482337. eCollection 2024. Int J Gen Med. 2024. PMID: 39712199 Free PMC article.
-
[Pediatric spine trauma-Results of a German national multicenter study including 367 patients].Unfallchirurg. 2020 Apr;123(4):280-288. doi: 10.1007/s00113-020-00771-0. Unfallchirurg. 2020. PMID: 32215669 German.
References
-
- McCaig LF, Burt CW. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2000 Emergency Department Summary. Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics. 2004. p. 340. - PubMed
-
- Diliberti T, Lindsey RW. Evaluation of the cervical spine in the emergency setting: who does not need an x-ray? Orthopedics - pcm. 1992;15:179–183. - PubMed
-
- Stiell IG, Clement C, McKnight RD, Brison R, Schull MJ, Rowe BH, Worthington JR, Eisenhauer MA, Cass D, Greenberg GH, MacPhail I, Dreyer J, Lee JS, Bandiera G, Reardon M, Holroyd B, Lesiuk H, Wells GA. The Canadian C-spine Rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2510–2518. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031375. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical