Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2011 Feb 1:11:1.
doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-11-1.

Evaluation of the safety of C-spine clearance by paramedics: design and methodology

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Evaluation of the safety of C-spine clearance by paramedics: design and methodology

Christian Vaillancourt et al. BMC Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: Canadian Emergency Medical Services annually transport 1.3 million patients with potential neck injuries to local emergency departments. Less than 1% of those patients have a c-spine fracture and even less (0.5%) have a spinal cord injury. Most injuries occur before the arrival of paramedics, not during transport to the hospital, yet most patients are transported in ambulances immobilized. They stay fully immobilized until a bed is available, or until physician assessment and/or X-rays are complete. The prolonged immobilization is often unnecessary and adds to the burden of already overtaxed emergency medical services systems and crowded emergency departments.

Methods/design: The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and potential impact of an active strategy that allows paramedics to assess very low-risk trauma patients using a validated clinical decision rule, the Canadian C-Spine Rule, in order to determine the need for immobilization during transport to the emergency department.This cohort study will be conducted in Ottawa, Canada with one emergency medical service. Paramedics with this service participated in an earlier validation study of the Canadian C-Spine Rule. Three thousand consecutive, alert, stable adult trauma patients with a potential c-spine injury will be enrolled in the study and evaluated using the Canadian C-Spine Rule to determine the need for immobilization. The outcomes that will be assessed include measures of safety (numbers of missed fractures and serious adverse outcomes), measures of clinical impact (proportion of patients transported without immobilization, key time intervals) and performance of the Rule.

Discussion: Approximately 40% of all very low-risk trauma patients could be transported safely, without c-spine immobilization, if paramedics were empowered to make clinical decisions using the Canadian C-Spine Rule. This safety study is an essential step before allowing all paramedics across Canada to selectively immobilize trauma victims before transport. Once safety and potential impact are established, we intend to implement a multi-centre study to study actual impact.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01188447.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Canadian C-Spine Rule. The Canadian C-Spine Rule for alert (Glasgow Coma Scale score 15) and stable trauma patients for whom cervical spine injury is a concern, including patients with either posterior neck pain with any blunt mechanism of injury or no neck pain but some visible injury above the clavicles. MVC, Motor vehicle crash.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McCaig LF, Burt CW. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2000 Emergency Department Summary. Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics. 2004. p. 340. - PubMed
    1. Reid DC, Henderson R, Saboe L, Miller JDR. Etiology and clinical course of missed spine fractures. J Trauma. 1987;27:980–986. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198709000-00005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Diliberti T, Lindsey RW. Evaluation of the cervical spine in the emergency setting: who does not need an x-ray? Orthopedics - pcm. 1992;15:179–183. - PubMed
    1. Bachulis BL, Long WB, Hynes GD, Johnson MC. Clinical indications for cervical spine radiographs in the traumatized patient. Am J Surg. 1987;153:473–477. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(87)90796-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stiell IG, Clement C, McKnight RD, Brison R, Schull MJ, Rowe BH, Worthington JR, Eisenhauer MA, Cass D, Greenberg GH, MacPhail I, Dreyer J, Lee JS, Bandiera G, Reardon M, Holroyd B, Lesiuk H, Wells GA. The Canadian C-spine Rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2510–2518. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031375. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data