The need for a re-evaluation of best supportive care studies reported to date
- PMID: 21285970
- PMCID: PMC3049572
- DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6606081
The need for a re-evaluation of best supportive care studies reported to date
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Cherny NI, Abernethy AP, Strasser F, Sapir R, Currow D, Zafar SY (2009) Improving the methodologic and ethical validity of best supportive care studies in oncology: lessons from a systematic review. J Clin Oncol 27(32): 5476–5486 - PubMed
-
- Connor SR, Pyenson B, Fitch K, Spence C, Iwasaki K (2007) Comparing hospice and nonhospice patient survival among patients who die within a three-year window. J Pain Symptom Manage 33(3): 238–246 - PubMed
-
- Currow DC, Wheeler JL, Glare PA, Kaasa S, Abernethy AP (2009) A framework for generalizability in palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage 37(3): 373–386 - PubMed
-
- Temel JS, Greer JA, Muzikansky A, Gallagher ER, Admane S, Jackson VA, Dahlin CM, Blinderman CD, Jacobsen J, Pirl WF, Billings JA, Lynch TJ (2010) Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 363: 733–742 - PubMed
-
- Tieman J, Sladek R, Currow DC (2008) Changes in the quantity and level of evidence of palliative and hospice care literature: the last century. J Clin Oncol 26(35): 5679–5683 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical