Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2011 Feb;26(2):191-5.
doi: 10.3346/jkms.2011.26.2.191. Epub 2011 Jan 24.

Immunogenicity and safety of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine: a randomized, double-blind, multi-center, phase 3 clinical trial in a vaccine-limited country

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Immunogenicity and safety of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine: a randomized, double-blind, multi-center, phase 3 clinical trial in a vaccine-limited country

Joon Young Song et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Influenza vaccines are the primary method for controlling influenza and its complications. This study was conducted as a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, controlled, multi-center trial at seven university hospitals to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of an inactivated, split, trivalent influenza vaccine (GC501, Green Cross Corporation, Yongin, Korea), which was newly manufactured in Korea in 2008. Between September 21 and 26, a total of 329 healthy subjects were recruited for the immunogenicity analysis, while 976 subjects were enrolled for the safety analysis. The GC501 vaccine met both FDA and EMEA criteria with ≥ 80% of subjects achieving post-vaccination titers ≥ 40 for all three subtypes, even in the elderly. The vaccine was well tolerated with only mild systemic and local adverse events. In summary, GC501 showed excellent immunogenicity and a good safety profile in both young adults and the elderly. The licensure of GC501 might be an important basis in preparation for the future influenza pandemic.

Keywords: Influenza Vaccines; Influenza, Human; Vaccines, Inactivated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of subjects through the study.

References

    1. Wilschut JC, McElhaney J, Palache B. Influenza. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Ltd; 2006. pp. 117–132.
    1. Park SC, Choeng HJ, Sohn JW, Choi SJ, Eom JS, Woo HJ, Chun BC, Kim WJ. Efficacy of influenza vaccination among chronic ill patients: retrospective case control study. Infect Chemother. 2004;36:207–212.
    1. Lee JS, Shin KC, Na BK, Lee JY, Kang C, Kim JH, Park O, Jeong EK, Lee JK, Kwon JW, Park SC, Kim WJ. Influenza surveillance in Korea: establishment and first results of an epidemiological and virological surveillance scheme. Epidemiol Infect. 2007;135:1117–1123. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kee SY, Lee JS, Cheong HJ, Chun BC, Song JY, Choi WS, Jo YM, Seo YB, Kim WJ. Influenza vaccine coverage rates and perceptions on vaccination in South Korea. J Infect. 2007;55:273–281. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Song JY, Cheong HJ, Hwang IS, Choi WS, Jo YM, Park DW, Cho GJ, Hwang TG, Kim WJ. Long-term immunogenicity of influenza vaccine among the elderly: Risk factors for poor immune response and persistence. Vaccine. 2010;28:3929–3935. - PubMed

Publication types