Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb;5(3):17-26.

Pharaoh and the Prospects for Productivity in HHR

Pharaoh and the Prospects for Productivity in HHR

Robert G Evans et al. Healthc Policy. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

When Pharaoh refused to supply straw, productivity plummeted in the Egyptian brick industry. But Pharaoh had other concerns. Anyway, the costs fell on Israelites, not Egyptians. Productivity improvement in the health sector is similarly constrained by competing objectives, and by the distribution of resulting gains and losses. Furthermore, health services have value only insofar as they improve health outcomes. Increased output of ineffective services is not productivity in any meaningful sense. Yet most of the literature on health human resources productivity focuses on outputs, not outcomes, ignoring serious questions about effectiveness. Proposals to refine the treatment of the health sector within the national accounts are similarly flawed. Proliferation of beneficial, harmful or simply unnecessary services would all be recorded as "productivity growth."

Lorsque le pharaon refusa de fournir de la paille, la productivité dans l'industrie égyptienne de la brique connut un déclin. Le pharaon avait d'autres préoccupations. Néanmoins, ce sont les Israéliens qui en ont payé les frais, pas les Égyptiens. L'amélioration de la productivité dans le secteur de la santé est semblablement contrainte par des objectifs concurrentiels, ainsi que par la distribution des pertes et des gains qui en découlent. De plus, ce n'est que par l'amélioration des résultats pour la santé que les services de santé acquièrent leur pleine valeur. Accroître les extrants pour des services inefficaces n'est d'aucune façon un signe de productivité. Cependant, la plupart de la littérature sur la productivité des ressources humaines en santé met l'accent sur les extrants, pas sur les résultats, faisant ainsi fi des questions importantes au sujet de l'efficacité. Les propositions visant à mettre au point le traitement du secteur de la santé dans les comptes nationaux sont également sans fondements. Toute prolifération de services, qu'ils soient avantageux, nuisibles ou simplement inutiles, serait donc considérée comme une ≪ croissance de la productivité. ≫

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barer M.L. New Opportunities for Old Mistakes. Health Affairs. 2002;21(1):169–71. Retrieved January 14, 2010. < http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/full/21/1/169>. - PubMed
    1. Barer M.L., Morgan S.G., Evans R.G. Strangulation or Rationalization? Costs and Access in Canadian Hospitals. Longwoods Review. 2003;1(4):10–19. Retrieved January 14, 2010. < http://www.longwoods.com/product.php?productid=17241&cat=366>.
    1. Berrington de Gonzáles A., Mahesh M., Kim K.-P., Bhargavan M., Lewis R., Mettler F., Land C. Projected Cancer Risks from Computed Tomography Scans Performed in the United States in 2007. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2009;169(22):2071–77. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) Medical Imaging in Canada. Ottawa: Author; 2008. 2007. Retrieved January 14, 2010. < http://secure.cihi.ca/cihiweb/dispPage.jsp?cw_page=AR_1043_E>.
    1. Evans R.G. There's No Reason for It, It's Just Our Policy. Healthcare Policy. 2009;5(2):14–24. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources